Add support for Python 3.14#170
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #170 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 547 550 +3
Branches 74 42 -32
=========================================
+ Hits 547 550 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11", | ||
| "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12", | ||
| "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13", | ||
| "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.14", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What are your general thoughts on removing such classifiers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's useful metadata, because they indicate that the maintainer has tested these versions and support them.
If there are no classifiers, I just have to try and install and run and hope for the best.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I find the maintenance of these to be burdensome but feel free to merge! Do you recall a proposal on the forums regarding this? I remember something about it but I'm not sure if it was a better mechanism that required less maintenance or if it was about simply removing these.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a recent suggestion in some thread about adding some extra metadata field to indicate the top tested version, but I can't find it now. A benefit would be that the intention of a dedicated field is clear, but it would be just as burdensome to update once per year.
Let's merge!
Please could you also look at #168 at some point? We could do a new release if that's okay. No rush though :)
2 participants
No description provided.