Repository navigation
Conversation
Two pieces from Cursor's pstack plugin (MIT, Lauren Tan), adapted to this repository. - .claude/skills/blast-radius: find what a change breaks outside its diff, then prove the one fact it's safe because of by running code, with a control that shows the proof can fail. pstack's references to its own why/arena/unslop skills become gh and git history, /code-review and the codex agent, and the house voice. It adds where grep stops here: content-addressed /a/ and /i/ bytes, derived files, KV and D1 shapes an older deploy wrote, the public JSON and MCP surfaces, and the Workers Free caps. The license ships beside it. - The Workers Issues routine let a "small and confident" fix become a draft PR from the stack trace alone. Step 5 now follows benny's rule: no reproduction, no fix. The draft needs a contract test that fails with the same error at the same frame through the real code, twice, without stubbing the function that threw, and the test ships with the fix. It also checks open PRs first so it never writes over another fix. - contract-workers-issues-become-one-github-issue pins the gate's four phrases. None of them appear in main's prompt, so each assertion fails there. The routine runs the prompt saved at claude.ai/code/routines, so this change reaches it only once the new text is pasted in.
Contributor
Wire-size diff vs merge base
Brotli q11, the quality the edge serves. Every number here is deterministic: Client assetsNo change. 39 files, 200.41 KiB Brotli total. PagesNo change. 74 files, 659.03 KiB Brotli total. Worker bundleNo change. 282.85 KiB gzip. Dictionary transportFamily dictionary acquisition: no change, 14.50 KiB q11.
|
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Preview URL | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
aadhar-sh | bd5b13a | Commit Preview URL Branch Preview URL |
Oct 14 2026, 06:20 AM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two pieces adapted from Cursor's pstack plugin (MIT, Lauren Tan): a project skill for checking what a change breaks, and a reproduction gate on the Workers Issues routine.
blast-radiusskill.claude/skills/blast-radius/finds what a change breaks outside its own diff. Its core rule: find the one fact the change is safe because of, prove it by running code, and run a control that shows the proof can fail. A list of maybes doesn't count.pstack's version leans on its own
why,arenaandunslopskills. Here those becomegh/githistory,/code-reviewor the Codex agent, and the house voice. The adaptation adds the places grep stops in this repository:/a/and/i/bytesThe description makes it fire on PRs labelled
release-pathorhashed-asset. The MIT license ships beside the skill.Reproduction gate on the triage routine
Before this,
docs/routines/workers-issue-triage.mdlet the routine open a draft fix PR whenever the fix was "small" and it was "confident", working from the stack trace alone. The new step 5 follows the rule from pstack'sbennyautomation: no reproduction, no fix.A draft now needs all of these:
fetch, but never stub the function that threw.config/,.github/or the release path.The test ships with the fix. If the routine can't reproduce the error, it says what it tried in the issue.
contract-workers-issues-become-one-github-issuepins four phrases from the gate. None appear in main's prompt, so each new assertion fails there.Action for you: the routine runs the copy saved at claude.ai/code/routines, so this change only takes effect once you paste the new text in.
Verification
bun run lint: clean.bun run test: 1,449 pass, 0 fail.