fix: pass domains to runtime options

[danielroe]

This no longer treats static as unique and moves domains to the global context.

closes #324

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #333 (f94fbbe) into main (1d85042) will decrease coverage by 45.24%.
The diff coverage is 40.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #333       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   59.50%   14.25%   -45.25%     
===========================================
  Files          26       24        -2     
  Lines         600      533       -67     
  Branches      150      136       -14     
===========================================
- Hits          357       76      -281     
- Misses        243      457      +214     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/module.ts	96.15% <ø> (-0.28%)	⬇️
src/provider.ts	59.45% <0.00%> (-12.77%)	⬇️
src/ipx.ts	73.07% <100.00%> (+1.07%)	⬆️
src/runtime/providers/glide.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/runtime/providers/imgix.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/runtime/providers/fastly.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/runtime/providers/static.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/runtime/providers/prismic.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-85.72%)	⬇️
src/runtime/providers/ipx.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-84.62%)	⬇️
src/runtime/components/image.mixin.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (-81.82%)	⬇️
... and 11 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d85042...f94fbbe. Read the comment docs.

[pi0]

Multi-provider purpose is to allow transparently switching between them (they can yet normalize to what they expect like trimming to hostname only) For domain is there any special reason to make it vendor-specific?

Why is important? By ensuring there is one source of trust of allowed domains, we can also warn users in runtime (without provider level check) domain is not included or automatically externalize.