Skip to content

docs: explain fall back to larger size on amplify + vercel - #1124

Merged
danielroe merged 2 commits into
nuxt:mainfrom
korve:patch-1
Nov 23, 2023
Merged

docs: explain fall back to larger size on amplify + vercel#1124
danielroe merged 2 commits into
nuxt:mainfrom
korve:patch-1

Conversation

@korve

@korve korve commented Nov 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The documentation states that the image provider will fallback to the >nearest< image width when a image width was not defined in the screens option. This is not the actual behavior. Actually, the next bigger screen width is return. I've tried to reflect this with this change.

The documentation states that the image provider will fallback to the >nearest< image width when a image width was not defined in the screens option. This is not the actual behavior. Actually, the next bigger screen width is return. I've tried to reflect this with this change.
@ghost

ghost commented Nov 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Live Preview ready!

Name Edit Preview Latest Commit
Image Edit on Studio ↗︎ View Live Preview c371d6e

@pi0 pi0 changed the title Fix incorrect vercel documentation docs(vercel): correct size chooing behavior Nov 23, 2023
@pi0

pi0 commented Nov 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks! Would you mind to also reflect same change for aws-amplify? 🙏🏼

@korve

korve commented Nov 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks! Would you mind to also reflect same change for aws-amplify? 🙏🏼

Yep, done :)

@danielroe danielroe changed the title docs(vercel): correct size chooing behavior docs: explain fall back to larger size on amplify + vercel Nov 23, 2023
@danielroe
danielroe merged commit 25329ec into nuxt:main Nov 23, 2023
riddla pushed a commit to tricks-gmbh/nuxt-image that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants