VSTHRD103 should flag violations amidst use of ?. expressions#1242
Merged
Conversation
It only shows up when failures occur.
AArnott
changed the title
?. expressions?. expressions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: line 62 comment, consider moving this above the if.
matthew-j-clark
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2023
This was referenced Aug 7, 2025
This was referenced Jun 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
VSTHRD103 should flag violations amidst use of
?.expressionsFixes #1235
Also workaround roslyn analyzer and xunit version , which only shows up when failures occur.