Skip to content

ANSI sequence "ESC [ 8;<lines>;<cols>t" fails to resize window in Terminal V1.4.3243.0, works in CMD.EXE (old console window) #8673

Closed

Description

# Environment

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19041.685]
Windows Terminal version: 1.4.3243.0

Any other software? No

Steps to reproduce

In a non-maximized Terminal window, type (or execute a CMD file containing)
echo E[8;52;160t
where "E" is an "escape" character (X'1B')

Expected behavior

Terminal window size should resize to 52 lines by 160 columns

Actual behavior

No change in Terminal window size.
Old Windows Console (CMD.EXE) resizes to 52 columns by 160 columns.

Documentation: from https://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html
CSI Ps ; Ps ; Ps t
Ps = 8 ; height ; width ⇒ Resize the text area to given
height and width in characters. Omitted parameters reuse the
current height or width. Zero parameters use the display's
height or width.

Activity

  1. ghost added
    Needs-TriageIt's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting
    on Dec 28, 2020
  2. ghost added
    Needs-Tag-FixDoesn't match tag requirements
    on Dec 28, 2020
  3. DHowett commented on Dec 28, 2020

    @DHowett
    Member

    Thanks! This is a /dupe of #5094

  4. ghost closed this as completedon Dec 28, 2020
  5. ghost removed
    Needs-TriageIt's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting
    on Dec 28, 2020
  6. ghost added
    Resolution-DuplicateThere's another issue on the tracker that's pretty much the same thing.
    on Dec 28, 2020
  7. ghost removed
    Needs-Tag-FixDoesn't match tag requirements
    on Dec 28, 2020
  8. Jibun-no-Kage commented on May 8, 2022

    @Jibun-no-Kage

    Any progress on this issue?

  9. steviator commented on Oct 5, 2024

    @steviator

    Apparently Windows Terminal is abandoned now. In four years nobody from the mothership has even bothered to respond to this report.

    Can anyone point me in the direction of a fork that is still actively developed, or should I revert to using conhost which still seems to be seeing improvements, and supports such advanced functionality?

  10. zadjii-msft commented on Oct 5, 2024

    @zadjii-msft
    Member

    steviator buddy a PR was merged for #5094 over in #17721 like, a month ago. Terminal is still very actively maintained. I'd follow #5094 for updates, rather than a random duplicate thread.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Resolution-DuplicateThere's another issue on the tracker that's pretty much the same thing.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions