Revert "Integrate SME1 SGEMM KleidiAI kernels" - #26053
Closed
Hariharan Seshadri (hariharans29) wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Hariharan Seshadri (hariharans29) wants to merge 1 commit into
Hariharan Seshadri (hariharans29) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This reverts commit ec3bf7f.
Hariharan Seshadri (hariharans29)
requested review from
Edward Chen (edgchen1) and
Changming Sun (snnn)
September 16, 2025 02:02
Changming Sun (snnn)
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2025
Edward Chen (edgchen1)
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2025
Hariharan Seshadri (hariharans29)
marked this pull request as draft
September 17, 2025 02:13
Hariharan Seshadri (hariharans29)
deleted the
revert-25760-SME1_sgemm_integration
branch
March 4, 2026 03:46
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #25760
Causes internal pipeline failure - revert it pending discussion on how to take this change in without causing the afore-mentioned failure