Merged
Conversation
Fixes #41586 Fixes #41588 1. For binary expressions, if the immediate parent is an IfStatement, then check the body of the if statement. I didn't walk upward to find an IfStatement because in my experimentation I found that binary expression uncalled-function errors are only issued when the expression is on the left of the top-most binary expression. 2. For property accesses with interspersed calls, I added a CallExpression case. In fact, any expression could appear here, but I only want to fix calls for now since that's all we've observed in Definitely Typed, and we didn't see anything else in the user tests or RWC tests. I also didn't examine parameters of the intermediate call expressions, but I don't think it's needed since the intent is to avoid false positives.
typescript-bot
added
For Milestone Bug
Member
Author
|
@a-tarasyuk thanks for your help on this so far. If you can think of a test case that would require walking up multiple nodes to look for an IfStatement, please let me know. |
| } | ||
| // ok | ||
| if (chrome.platformKeys.subtleCrypto().exportKey) { | ||
| chrome.platformKeys.subtleCrypto().exportKey |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I need more coffee; why is this ok?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because it's "used" in the body of the if, even if it's not called.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You just need a usage in the body. It doesn't actually have to call it.
Member
|
@typescript-bot pack this |
Collaborator
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the perf test suite on this PR at 7265f49. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Collaborator
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 7265f49. You can monitor the build here. |
Collaborator
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 7265f49. You can monitor the build here. |
Collaborator
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the parallelized community code test suite on this PR at 7265f49. You can monitor the build here. |
Collaborator
|
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at 7265f49. You can monitor the build here. |
Collaborator
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here they are:Comparison Report - master..41599
System
Hosts
Scenarios
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collaborator
|
The user suite test run you requested has finished and failed. I've opened a PR with the baseline diff from master. |
andrewbranch
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #41586
Fixes #41588
For binary expressions, if the immediate parent is an IfStatement, then check the body of the if statement. I didn't walk upward to find an IfStatement because in my experimentation I found that binary expression uncalled-function errors are only issued when the expression is on the left of the top-most binary expression.
For property accesses with interspersed calls, I added a CallExpression case. In fact, any expression could appear here, but I only want to fix calls for now since that's all we've observed in Definitely Typed, and we didn't see anything else in the user tests or RWC tests. I also didn't examine parameters of the intermediate call expressions, but I don't think it's needed since the intent is to avoid false positives.