Skip to content

Comments

chore: verify lockfile changes contain only 2.82.0 → 2.83.0 Fluid Framework bump#1809

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intodependabot/npm_and_yarn/brainstorm/main/fluid-framework-dependencies-60ec8e0641from
copilot/sub-pr-1806
Closed

chore: verify lockfile changes contain only 2.82.0 → 2.83.0 Fluid Framework bump#1809
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intodependabot/npm_and_yarn/brainstorm/main/fluid-framework-dependencies-60ec8e0641from
copilot/sub-pr-1806

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Feb 20, 2026

Reviewed lockfile changes across all three directories to confirm no unintended changes were introduced alongside the Fluid Framework dependency bump.

Findings:

  • All three package-lock.json files (brainstorm, item-counter, item-counter-spe) contain zero remaining 2.82.0 references
  • All packages at 2.83.0 are exclusively @fluidframework/*, @fluid-internal/client-utils, and fluid-framework — the client ecosystem packages that version together
  • Transitive dependency counts (39/35/38) exceed the directly-listed packages (7/6/6) as expected — they include co-versioned dependencies like @fluidframework/container-runtime, @fluidframework/tree, @fluidframework/map, etc.
  • Unrelated @fluidframework/server-* packages (7.0.0) and build infra packages (@fluidframework/build-common at 2.0.3) follow separate versioning schemes and were not touched

No unintended changes found; lockfiles are clean.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Bump fluid-framework dependencies in /brainstorm directory chore: verify lockfile changes contain only 2.82.0 → 2.83.0 Fluid Framework bump Feb 20, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from markfields February 20, 2026 19:57
@markfields markfields closed this Feb 20, 2026
@markfields markfields deleted the copilot/sub-pr-1806 branch February 20, 2026 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants