Skip to content

ci(review): bump ci-workflows claude-review pin to df54d0e - #148

Merged
kyle-sexton merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/bump-claude-review-pin
Jul 16, 2026
Merged

ci(review): bump ci-workflows claude-review pin to df54d0e#148
kyle-sexton merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/bump-claude-review-pin

Conversation

@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Bumps the pinned melodic-software/ci-workflows/.github/workflows/claude-review.yml reference from 99ac2f8 to df54d0e.

Picks up the claude-review outcome-detection fix: the reusable workflow previously reported success even when the underlying review genuinely failed. Fixed upstream in melodic-software/ci-workflows#117 (melodic-software/ci-workflows#117).

One-line pin bump following the file's existing @<sha> # <short-sha> <date> comment convention; no other changes.

Test plan

  • CI green (pr-title, markdown lint, lychee, review bot).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…etection fix)

Picks up the claude-review outcome-detection fix from ci-workflows: the
reusable workflow previously reported success even when the underlying
review genuinely failed. Fixed upstream in
melodic-software/ci-workflows#117.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 59bc8ea8d3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/claude-review.yml
The runner-policy lint keys its reviewed-contract check on the exact
workflow@SHA, so bumping the pin without a matching policy.json entry
fails closed by design. Add an entry for df54d0e mirroring the retired
99ac2f8 entry (routing, allowed inputs/secrets are unchanged — only
the pinned commit moved).
@kyle-sexton kyle-sexton changed the title ci(review): bump ci-workflows claude-review pin to df54d0e (outcome-detection fix) ci(review): bump ci-workflows claude-review pin to df54d0e Jul 16, 2026
@kyle-sexton
kyle-sexton merged commit a0812eb into main Jul 16, 2026
40 checks passed
@kyle-sexton
kyle-sexton deleted the fix/bump-claude-review-pin branch July 16, 2026 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant