Skip to content

fix(repo-sweep): distinguish report-only findings from no findings (#4575) - #4866

Merged
cursor[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/4575-no-findings-tick-37e9
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

cursor[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/4575-no-findings-tick-37e9

Conversation

@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #4575

Summary

repo-sweep tick.sh gains a report-only path; next.md gates ticks on user review and separates report-only from no findings.

Verification

playbooks 0.13.9.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

…4575)

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR body contract — issue linkage

This PR body does not yet satisfy the issue-linkage contract:

  • Missing a "## Fix" section. State the concrete change and how it addresses the problem.
  • Missing a "## Related" section. List related PRs, ADRs, or decision-log entries this PR does not close.

Edit the body and this comment updates itself on the next run.

@cursor
cursor Bot marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2026 03:46
@cursor
cursor Bot merged commit dec21d0 into main Sep 28, 2026
32 checks passed
@cursor
cursor Bot deleted the cursor/4575-no-findings-tick-37e9 branch September 28, 2026 03:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

repo-sweep next: no-findings tick conflates nothing fixed with nothing found

2 participants