fix(work-items): read frontier tier from capability-tier label (#1716) by kyle-sexton · Pull Request #2565 · melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

kyle-sexton · 2026-08-13T05:54:51Z

Summary

Moves the work-loop frontier-tier signal from triage briefing body prose onto the provider-permissioned capability-tier: frontier label. Missing label fails closed to the general tier.

Fix

work-loop Adaptive item cap reads the label from list-frontier projections
item-content-trust: remove tightening-only body carve-out; add enforced-by-name entry
label-taxonomy / capability-tier-labels docs
triage Capability-tier stamp rule
evals updated for label-based prompt
work-items version bump

Verification

CI skill-quality / changelog-parity / plugin-options-docs

The check is green on purpose, and it is not evidence. It certifies that a security pass ran, and this one did not complete — but the cause is outside this PR's control, so merging is deliberately left unblocked rather than locking every merge for the length of the outage. Nothing was reviewed at this head. Where this check is required, it is satisfied without that evidence; a human should review security-sensitive changes here before merging.

Re-run the job, or workflow_dispatch this workflow with the PR number, to retry the review (ci-workflows#227). A new push also retries it only if the caller's pull_request triggers include synchronize (the canonical security caller keeps it). An automatic retry may already have run — it is skipped when a partial review could duplicate comments, or when the failure class needs an operator.

Re-running does NOT help for every class:

rate-limit that persists across re-runs, or auth — the credential or usage budget needs an operator; retrying will not clear it.
a run that exhausted its turn budget ("subtype":"error_max_turns" above) will exhaust it again. As the PR author, split the change into smaller PRs; raising --max-turns is a change to the caller workflow, not something you can set on this PR.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a9fbad8983

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

claude · 2026-08-13T06:00:33Z

Claude encountered an error after 2s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

claude · 2026-08-13T06:02:25Z

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

github-actions · 2026-08-13T06:02:37Z

Warning

Automated review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict.

Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."

Run: https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/actions/runs/31675193034
Failure class: rate-limit
Last SDK result: {"subtype":"success","is_error":true,"num_turns":1,"duration_ms":320,"total_cost_usd":0,"api_error_status":429,"class":"rate-limit"}

Re-run the job, or workflow_dispatch this workflow with the PR number, to retry the review. A new push re-triggers this lane only if the caller's pull_request triggers include synchronize (the canonical caller omits it).
An automatic retry may already have run — it is skipped when a partial review could duplicate comments, or when the failure class needs an operator (auth).

claude · 2026-08-13T06:08:23Z

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

claude · 2026-08-13T06:29:35Z

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

Add capability-tier-labels.md reference, tracker-seam axis row, and manifest/README descriptions. Document github-iac provisioning requirement and security-surface dispatch vs quota-guard separation. Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

…ll (#1716) Add setup check probe 8 and apply steps for capability-tier: frontier label provisioning, plus a one-shot backfill path for items that carry only pre-#1716 triage-briefing body stamps. Triage refuses to re-triage already-triaged output, so setup apply runs backfill-capability-tier-labels.sh after the axis exists. Bump to 0.35.21. Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

Move capability-tier migration and backfill procedures to progressive- disclosure reference spokes. Shorten the setup description to stay under the 1536-char listing cap and bring SKILL.md under the 500-line hard cap. Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

…vals JSON changelog-parity --check-preserved requires the fork-point ## [0.35.19] section to remain; keep #1716 notes under 0.35.20/0.35.21. Insert the missing comma before eval cases 14–15 so check-jsonschema can parse. Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

claude · 2026-08-13T06:43:12Z

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

claude · 2026-08-13T06:46:46Z

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

…egacy signal lib Flatten nested setup SKILL list to satisfy markdownlint. Invoke label-existence checks outside if conditions for SC2310. Mark legacy-frontier-tier-signal.sh executable in the git index.

…gnal lib

…t index

claude · 2026-08-13T06:54:51Z

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

github-actions Bot deleted a comment from claude Bot Aug 13, 2026

kyle-sexton marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2026 05:56

github-actions Bot deleted a comment from claude Bot Aug 13, 2026

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Aug 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread plugins/work-items/reference/capability-tier-labels.md

Comment thread plugins/work-items/reference/capability-tier-labels.md

github-actions Bot deleted a comment from claude Bot Aug 13, 2026

cursor Bot force-pushed the cursor/frontier-tier-label-1716-d116 branch from 9bcc9e8 to ecda054 Compare August 13, 2026 06:01

github-actions Bot deleted a comment from claude Bot Aug 13, 2026

cursoragent and others added 6 commits August 13, 2026 06:29

fix(work-items): read frontier tier from capability-tier label (#1716)

8624b41

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

chore(work-items): sync plugin options docs

8c5bd52

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

chore(work-items): bump to 0.35.20 to serialize after #1668

63320a8

Co-authored-by: Kyle Sexton <kyle-sexton@users.noreply.github.com>

cursor Bot force-pushed the cursor/frontier-tier-label-1716-d116 branch from e60e9ba to 626b348 Compare August 13, 2026 06:40

github-actions Bot deleted a comment from claude Bot Aug 13, 2026

cursoragent added 2 commits August 13, 2026 06:47

fix(work-items): hygiene — markdown, shellcheck SC2310, exec bit on l…

0cbb865

…egacy signal lib Flatten nested setup SKILL list to satisfy markdownlint. Invoke label-existence checks outside if conditions for SC2310. Mark legacy-frontier-tier-signal.sh executable in the git index.

fix(work-items): shellcheck SC2310 disables and exec bit on legacy si…

5ca317c

…gnal lib

fix(work-items): mark legacy-frontier-tier-signal.sh executable in gi…

8b7f1dc

…t index

github-actions Bot deleted a comment from claude Bot Aug 13, 2026

kyle-sexton merged commit 305d31a into main Aug 13, 2026
38 checks passed

kyle-sexton deleted the cursor/frontier-tier-label-1716-d116 branch August 13, 2026 06:55

Uh oh!

Conversation

kyle-sexton commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Fix

Verification

Related

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

kyle-sexton commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

claude Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading