fix(work-items): work-loop audit peels for #1668 (F1–F3)

[kyle-sexton]

Closes #1668

Summary

Implements the three IMPLEMENT_NOW slices from frontier consensus on #1668 (F3 clamp, F2 eval rewrite, F1 telemetry Gotcha). Deferred slices recorded below — no new issues.

Fix

• Clamp persisted item_cap into resolved [floor, ceiling] on durable-state re-read; report and persist
• Rewrite drain-exit eval to retained-snapshot-ids-only (mode-drain.md)
• Gotcha in telemetry-upsert.md for compound-shell classifier + isolated-calls fallback
• work-items version bump

Verification

• scripts/affected-tests.sh --run on touched paths
• CI skill-quality / changelog-parity

Related

Deferred follow-ups stay as comments on #1668 (no new issues): F1 bundled script / autoMode.allow; F3 full quarantine; F4 pattern-escalation.

[cursor]

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[github-actions]

Warning

Automated review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict.

Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."

• Run: https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/actions/runs/31673090877
• Failure class: rate-limit
• Last SDK result: {"subtype":"success","is_error":true,"num_turns":1,"duration_ms":337,"total_cost_usd":0,"api_error_status":429,"class":"rate-limit"}

Re-run the job, or workflow_dispatch this workflow with the PR number, to retry the review. A new push re-triggers this lane only if the caller's pull_request triggers include synchronize (the canonical caller omits it).
An automatic retry may already have run — it is skipped when a partial review could duplicate comments, or when the failure class needs an operator (auth).

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[github-actions]

Warning

Automated security review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict.

Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."

• Run: https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/actions/runs/31671899217
• Failure class: rate-limit
• Last SDK result: {"subtype":"success","is_error":true,"num_turns":1,"duration_ms":297,"total_cost_usd":0,"api_error_status":429,"class":"rate-limit"}

The check is green on purpose, and it is not evidence. It certifies that a security pass ran, and this one did not complete — but the cause is outside this PR's control, so merging is deliberately left unblocked rather than locking every merge for the length of the outage. Nothing was reviewed at this head. Where this check is required, it is satisfied without that evidence; a human should review security-sensitive changes here before merging.

Re-run the job, or workflow_dispatch this workflow with the PR number, to retry the review (ci-workflows#227). A new push also retries it only if the caller's pull_request triggers include synchronize (the canonical security caller keeps it). An automatic retry may already have run — it is skipped when a partial review could duplicate comments, or when the failure class needs an operator.

Re-running does NOT help for every class:

• rate-limit that persists across re-runs, or auth — the credential or usage budget needs an operator; retrying will not clear it.
• a run that exhausted its turn budget ("subtype":"error_max_turns" above) will exhaust it again. As the PR author, split the change into smaller PRs; raising --max-turns is a change to the caller workflow, not something you can set on this PR.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 467da129c3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.