docs(work-items): disambiguate triage lane standing directive

[kyle-sexton]

Closes #570

Summary

Disambiguates triage's autonomous-lane term from re-anchor's homonym and names when a general mandate satisfies the direction gate.

Fix

Renames to lane standing directive, contrasts with re-anchor standing rules, and states that a general mandate counts only when it explicitly authorizes triage mutations.

Verification

• work-items 0.35.4 version bump

Related

N/A

[cursor]

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 29s —— View job

---

Security Review

• Gather context (PR diff, changed files)
• Review changed files for security issues
• Post findings

Scope: plugins/work-items/.claude-plugin/plugin.json (version bump), plugins/work-items/CHANGELOG.md (changelog entry), plugins/work-items/skills/triage/SKILL.md (prose clarification of the "standing rules" vs. "lane standing directive" terminology in the direction-gate section).

Findings: none.

This PR is a documentation-only change — a version bump, a changelog entry, and a wording edit to a skill's markdown instructions clarifying when an autonomous-lane mandate satisfies the "direction gate" before triage mutations. There is no code, no GitHub Actions workflow, no script execution logic, and no handling of tokens/secrets/credentials touched by this diff. The edited prose does not alter any enforcement mechanism, permission check, or trust boundary — it only renames/clarifies terminology and adds a sentence narrowing what counts as a valid mandate ("a general mandate such as 'handle routine work' counts only when it explicitly authorizes triage label/comment mutations"), which if anything tightens rather than loosens the gate description. No injection surfaces, authorization gaps, or supply-chain/workflow risk are present in these files.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dc59db25bc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 2m 23s —— View job

---

Review complete — PR #2379

• Gather context (diff, CLAUDE.md, REVIEW.md)
• Understand the request (code review of docs/skill change)
• Review changed files for correctness & alignment
• Post findings

Summary

This is a docs-only change (SKILL.md prose, plugin.json version bump, CHANGELOG entry) with no code or security surface. Scope: plugins/work-items/skills/triage/SKILL.md, plugins/work-items/.claude-plugin/plugin.json, plugins/work-items/CHANGELOG.md.

• Version bump 0.35.3 → 0.35.4 is clean (confirmed against origin/main, no collision).
• CHANGELOG entry format/category (### Fixed) is consistent with prior entries in this file.
• The new "lane standing directive" wording achieves the PR's stated goal: it distinguishes the autonomous-lane mandate from a homonymous term, and the added sentence ("A general mandate ... counts only when it explicitly authorizes triage label/comment mutations; otherwise fall back to the interactive branch") directly closes the ambiguity work-items(triage): SKILL.md 'standing rules' term collides with re-anchor's different sense + no guidance for ambiguous general-authorization case #570 asked about.
• One inline finding below: the new text names a nonexistent re-anchor plugin — the actual plugin is discipline (re-anchor is a keyword/mechanism it uses, not its name). Flagged inline since it's directly on the changed line, and it's a bit ironic given this PR's entire purpose is disambiguating terminology precisely so it doesn't mislead a future reader (human or agent).

No REVIEW.md-scoped correctness/error-handling/atomicity concerns apply here — this isn't a multi-write or authz/data-access change. No security lane overlap. Root CLAUDE.md and .claude-pr/CLAUDE.md are both empty, so no repo-specific guidelines beyond REVIEW.md applied.

Note on tooling: git fetch/gh issue view calls required interactive approval not available in this run, so I diffed via gh pr diff 2379 instead of git diff origin/main...HEAD; this did not limit the review.
· branch cursor/triage-standing-rules-disambig-63e1

[github-actions]

Claude has reviewed this PR 1 time. The lane skips further automatic reviews after 5; deleting this comment resets the count.