Skip to content

chore: raise loop-lane merge rung to c3-autonomous - #1693

Closed
kyle-sexton wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/loop-lane-merge-c3
Closed

chore: raise loop-lane merge rung to c3-autonomous#1693
kyle-sexton wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/loop-lane-merge-c3

Conversation

@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Raises babysit_loop_merge from c2-mechanical to c3-autonomous in the team-tracked loop-lane config. Per the loop-lane convention, merge-rung raises are seam-only reviewed changes; merging this PR is the ratification. The C4-structural / C5-untrusted-provenance human-merge floor is unconditional and unaffected.

Test plan

Config-only change. Verified c3-autonomous is a valid rung name per the plugin's config-resolution reference (human-only < c2-mechanical < c3-autonomous < full-autonomy) and that only the one value line changed.

Related

Loop-lane convention: https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/blob/main/docs/conventions/loop-lane/README.md

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_012eb4vPNzgNh7Br4qoiN4Yj

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012eb4vPNzgNh7Br4qoiN4Yj
@claude

claude Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

@claude

claude Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claude encountered an error after 1s —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Automated review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict.

Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."

Re-running the job, or pushing a new commit, will retry the review.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Automated security review did not complete — this is an infrastructure failure, not a review verdict.

Treat any Claude comment on this PR (including a placeholder like "I'll analyze this and get back to you") as incomplete, not "no findings."

Re-running the job, or pushing a new commit, will retry the review.

@kyle-sexton
kyle-sexton marked this pull request as draft July 27, 2026 03:25
@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

On hold: conflicts with the recorded decision in #1388 and the missing C3 auto-merge cell tracked in #1646; awaiting operator direction.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1a2b6c902d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .claude/source-control.md
## babysit_loop_merge

c2-mechanical
c3-autonomous

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep C3 changes behind human merge

For any merge-capable babysit-loop invocation that does not pass a lower merge cap, this makes C3 PRs eligible for unattended merge, even though plugins/autonomy/reference/guardrails.md:19-25 defines C3 as human-merge and provides no promotion path for that cell. The repository-specific profile is even more explicit: prompts/loops/loop-lane-prompts.md:1177-1185 records the operator's decision against this raise, notes that nearly the entire agent-ready backlog would become eligible, and requires amending the guardrail contract first. Revert this raise unless that governing policy and authorization are changed first.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

kyle-sexton added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2026
…auto-merge cell

Codex review findings on the contract amendment:

- P1: schema documented only C2 auto-merge and the checker rejected both
  merge_policy.C3 "auto" and promotion_state.C3-auto-merge, so guided setup
  could not validate or activate the new cell. C3 joins AUTO_MERGE_ELIGIBLE
  and PROMOTABLE_CELLS, gets the same unratified-promotion gate as C2, and a
  c3-auto-unratified fixture exercises the gate (374 checks pass).
- P2: rung narrative claimed c3-autonomous while this repo's tracked seam is
  still c2-mechanical at this commit; reworded to tie the raise to the
  ratified seam flip (#1693) landing with this amendment, and updated the
  merge-lane copy-block rationale to the post-ratification state.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PfjSBcWkzNFCydZQYsfUc4
kyle-sexton added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2026
…ontract amendment

Codex flagged twice that the rung narrative described c3-autonomous while
the tracked seam still read c2-mechanical in this commit. Root cause was
splitting this repo's ratification across two PRs; fold the one-line
babysit_loop_merge flip into the amendment so contract, seam, and narrative
agree at every commit. Staged seam PR #1693 becomes superseded by this PR;
the other watched repos keep their seam PRs. Also rewraps a paragraph so a
"#1695" reference no longer starts a line (MD018).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PfjSBcWkzNFCydZQYsfUc4
@kyle-sexton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #1694: the contract amendment folded this repository's one-line babysit_loop_merge flip into the same reviewed change (Codex review on #1694 flagged the split as a narrative/config contradiction), so this seam PR's diff already landed with commit ba789fe. Closing unmerged; the raise is live on main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant