Repository navigation
feat(review): revert-pair lister, case builder and caught missed report for code-review evals - #13031
Conversation
Lane-Activity: work-resolve-issue/resolve-issue
|
claude-security-review reviewed Security review (incremental): PR #13031No security issues found. This review covers the changes since What changed. The Revert cases section of the README now gives the verifier's steps in more detail. When the verifier drops a falsely matched line, it must remove it from all three places
After that, the verifier names itself on the Why there is no finding.
Earlier review. My review of Spend. None in CI. critical-findings: 0 |
|
claude-review reviewed Code review (incremental): PR #13031, changes since
|
|
The unattended merge path armed native auto-merge at head |
Lane-Activity: pr-unblock/address-feedback Lane-Thread: PRRT_kwDOTCGFQM6zaOfm
|
pr-unblock / address-feedback finished round 1 of max 4 on ae5b07e. |
Refs: #12939
Summary
Opened by the work-resolve-issue lane. The run's own summary:
Remaining work
bash plugins/review/evals/revert-cases.sh liston a clone with full history, thenbuild <original> <revert> <slug>for each listed pair (this lane's checkout is a one-commit shallow clone)Not verified
listwas not run over real history: the checkout has one commit and WebFetch gives only summaries of GitHub diffs. Both are listed in remainingclaude plugin evalrun of revert- cases: none exist yetfican be listed at two places (the verifier step drops these); the grader keys on the basename, so two caught files with the same basename in different directories can cross-match; a path…Fix
Verification
The runner ran each check from the base copy against 75850c4:
The run reports:
listcould not run over real history hereLeft out: the items under Not verified.
Related
#12939