docs(topics): advance work-loop plan Phase 5 and Phase 6 tags

[kyle-sexton]

Summary

Advances the tracked plan's Phase 5 and Phase 6 tags to [DONE]: the ci-workflows tracker binding is merged (melodic-software/ci-workflows#229, labels via melodic-software/github-iac#211, sanity checks + concurrent claim-race PASS recorded there), and the standards lease-activation draft branch is pushed with its PR body prepared for the operator (never auto-filed, per the phase contract).

Test plan

• markdownlint clean; tag-only change (two lines)

Related

No linked issue.

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 59s —— View job

---

PR Review — docs(topics): advance work-loop plan Phase 5 and Phase 6 tags

• Gather context and read changed files
• Review diff for correctness and alignment with guidelines
• Post final review

---

Summary

Two-line documentation update advancing Phase 5 and Phase 6 headings in docs/topics/ci-workflows-work-loop/PLAN.md from [TODO] to [DONE].

Changes:

• Line 370: Phase 5: ci-workflows tracker binding [TODO] → [DONE]
• Line 397: Phase 6: standards lease-activation PR draft [TODO] → [DONE]

Review

Correctness: The PR body supplies the necessary evidence for each tag:

• Phase 5 — feat(tracker): bind the work-items tracker seam (github provider) ci-workflows#229 merged, labels provisioned via melodic-software/github-iac#211, and the concurrent claim-race sanity check recorded as PASS. The phase's sanity checks (concurrent, not sequential, dual-claim exits 0 + 7) are documented as satisfied.
• Phase 6 — draft branch pushed, PR body prepared, gh pr list confirmed empty (nothing auto-filed). This matches the phase's explicit "never auto-filed" contract written at lines 403–408.

CLAUDE.md alignment:

• Branch: docs/phase-5-6-tags — matches <type>/<description> convention ✓
• PR title: docs(topics): advance work-loop plan Phase 5 and Phase 6 tags — valid Conventional Commits form ✓
• Change is documentation-only; plugin design rules (repo-agnostic, configurable, security-reviewed) are not in scope ✓

REVIEW.md blocking checks: None triggered — no code execution, auth, tenant data, secrets, injection surface, or multi-location write atomicity concerns in a Markdown tag update.

No findings. This is a clean, well-scoped tracking update with external evidence cited in the PR body. ✅