You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
planning: lay out multiple "needs" chips in one row and mark met prerequisites in text #5917
Each "needs Qn" chip is its own flex row inside the flex-column .qbody (index.html:130, 134, 748), so a question with five prerequisites takes five extra lines in the rail. Met and unmet prerequisites differ only by colour (.needs.unmet, index.html:136).
Expected
All "needs" chips sit in one wrapped row under the title, and a met prerequisite is marked by more than colour.
Suggested fix
In railItem (index.html:748), wrap the chips in one <span class="needsrow"> with display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:4px, and add "(answered)" text or an icon for met prerequisites (parentMet, index.html:640).
Acceptance criteria
A question with five prerequisites renders them in one wrapped row under its title, at desktop and phone widths.
Met and unmet prerequisites can be told apart without colour.
Routing: delegable, work-class: scoped (C3, bug-fix), priority: low. Verified against current code: each "needs Qn" chip renders as its own block inside the rail item's flex-column body, and met vs unmet chips differ only by colour. No open decision; the acceptance criteria are testable.
Basis: verified, plugins/planning/surface/index.html:130 (.qbody flex column), :134-136 (.needs, .needs.unmet colour only), :748 (one span per prerequisite in railItem).
Serialize: this edits the same rail-item builder as #5922 and the other interview-page fixes (#5815, #5908, #5910, #5911, #5913, #5916). Dispatch one at a time.
Agent Brief
Type: Bug Summary: On the /planning:interview page, lay out a question's "needs Qn" prerequisite chips in one wrapped row and mark met prerequisites without relying on colour.
Current behavior:
In the question rail, each prerequisite chip ("needs Q5") is its own row under the question title, so a question with five prerequisites takes five extra lines. A met prerequisite and an unmet one differ only by text colour.
Desired behavior:
All of a question's prerequisite chips sit in a single row under its title that wraps when it runs out of width, at desktop and phone widths.
A met prerequisite (answered, or archived off the path, the same predicate the page already uses for "met") carries a non-colour marker, such as "(answered)" text or an icon with an accessible label, so met and unmet can be told apart in greyscale and by a screen reader.
Unmet chips keep their current look apart from layout.
Key interfaces:
The rail-item builder (railItem) and its "needs" chip markup.
The existing "parent met" predicate; reuse it, do not add a second definition.
Acceptance criteria:
A question with five prerequisites renders them in one wrapped row under its title at desktop and phone widths.
Met and unmet prerequisites can be told apart without colour (visible text or an icon with an accessible name).
Ratify autonomous dispatch of this C3 bug-fix item?
Classification: work-class: scoped (C3), bug-fix-shaped (confirmed at triage). Intended dispatch: the work-loop worker lane, through /work-items:work, to a draft PR the lane never merges, serialized with the other interview-page fixes. First drain is not complete and no item-level ratification exists, so it is queued here. Ratify through /work-items:attend-queue.
Delivered on branch feat/planning-interview-page-batch in draft PR #7182, one commit for this issue (with Closes #5917).
The needs chips share one wrapped row under the title, and a met prerequisite carries a check mark with an "answered" accessible label.
Verified: ui_page phase 1 checks a five-prerequisite question at 1440 and 390 px; ui_a checks the row layout. The full surface.test.sh was last run in full before the final page commits; the later commits were checked with the ui_page phases. Its one standing failure (AC34 "user name found") is an environment artifact that also fails on main.
Left for a human: the PR stays a draft until Kyle flips it to ready, which starts the CI and review lanes.
Activity
kyle-sexton commentedon Oct 4, 2026
This was generated by AI during triage.
Routing: delegable,
work-class: scoped(C3, bug-fix),priority: low. Verified against current code: each "needs Qn" chip renders as its own block inside the rail item's flex-column body, and met vs unmet chips differ only by colour. No open decision; the acceptance criteria are testable.Basis: verified,
plugins/planning/surface/index.html:130(.qbodyflex column),:134-136(.needs,.needs.unmetcolour only),:748(one span per prerequisite inrailItem).Serialize: this edits the same rail-item builder as #5922 and the other interview-page fixes (#5815, #5908, #5910, #5911, #5913, #5916). Dispatch one at a time.
Agent Brief
Type: Bug
Summary: On the
/planning:interviewpage, lay out a question's "needs Qn" prerequisite chips in one wrapped row and mark met prerequisites without relying on colour.Current behavior:
In the question rail, each prerequisite chip ("needs Q5") is its own row under the question title, so a question with five prerequisites takes five extra lines. A met prerequisite and an unmet one differ only by text colour.
Desired behavior:
Key interfaces:
railItem) and its "needs" chip markup.Acceptance criteria:
Out of scope:
kyle-sexton commentedon Oct 4, 2026
This was generated by AI during work-loop.
Ratify autonomous dispatch of this C3 bug-fix item?
Classification:
work-class: scoped(C3), bug-fix-shaped (confirmed at triage). Intended dispatch: the work-loop worker lane, through/work-items:work, to a draft PR the lane never merges, serialized with the other interview-page fixes. First drain is not complete and no item-level ratification exists, so it is queued here. Ratify through/work-items:attend-queue.Lane: work-loop, instance melo-worker-1, cycle 2.
fix(planning): lay out needs chips in one row and mark met ones in te…
kyle-sexton commentedon Oct 11, 2026
Delivered on branch
feat/planning-interview-page-batchin draft PR #7182, one commit for this issue (withCloses #5917).The needs chips share one wrapped row under the title, and a met prerequisite carries a check mark with an "answered" accessible label.
Verified: ui_page phase 1 checks a five-prerequisite question at 1440 and 390 px; ui_a checks the row layout. The full
surface.test.shwas last run in full before the final page commits; the later commits were checked with the ui_page phases. Its one standing failure (AC34 "user name found") is an environment artifact that also fails on main.Left for a human: the PR stays a draft until Kyle flips it to ready, which starts the CI and review lanes.
The
needs-humanlabel was left for Kyle to clear.Generated by Claude Code