Skip to content

roadmap: materialize Agent Runtime Assurance work items - #197

Merged
mashkovd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
roadmap/materialize-agent-runtime-assurance
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

mashkovd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
roadmap/materialize-agent-runtime-assurance

Conversation

@mashkovd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Materializes the active Agent Runtime Assurance epic (#151) into seven executable mctl-agents work items and binds them into the canonical roadmap DAG.

Created issues:

The dependency chain remains the same as the existing canonical manifest; this PR only attaches concrete issue identities to each required work item.

No implementation/intake label is added to the child issues. The intended first execution slice is #694 only; downstream issues remain blocked by the canonical DAG.

Existing policy/approval/evidence owners (mctl-agents#197/#198/#199) are reused, not reimplemented. Historical proof remains based on safe fixtures for mctl-agents#183 and mctl-telegram#602.

@claude

claude Bot commented Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Claude finished @mashkovd's task in 14s —— View job


Review

Approved. The diff only adds issue bindings (mctl-agents#694–700) to the seven work items in roadmap/epics/agent-runtime-assurance.yaml. The dependsOn chain is unchanged and the field format matches the other epics. No P1/P2/P3 findings.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Antigravity (agy) review — informational

Model: gemini-3.8-flash-high · commit aef39e5.

No significant issues found.

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Roadmap YAML only: attaches issue identities to seven work items, DAG unchanged, format matches other epics.

@mashkovd
mashkovd merged commit e181d51 into main Oct 28, 2026
7 checks passed
@mashkovd
mashkovd deleted the roadmap/materialize-agent-runtime-assurance branch October 28, 2026 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant