Fix run_clang_repl output when not present#161412
Merged
Merged
Conversation
On the happy path, when `clang-repl` is present, we will invoke it in order to determine if the host supports JIT features. That will return a string containing "true". However, in cases where `clang-repl` is not present or we fail to invoke it, we previously returned `False`, which would then trigger a failure with our substring check. This PR updates the function to return `""` instead, so the substring check is still valid. This is related to llvm#157359, where the original change was introduced.
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Jeaye Wilkerson (jeaye) ChangesOn the happy path, when This is related to #157359, where the original change was introduced. @vgvassilev for review. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161412.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/test/lit.cfg.py b/clang/test/lit.cfg.py
index 64e2bbad8f3b2..e6c79d7a71b51 100644
--- a/clang/test/lit.cfg.py
+++ b/clang/test/lit.cfg.py
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ def run_clang_repl(args):
clang_repl_exe = lit.util.which("clang-repl", config.clang_tools_dir)
if not clang_repl_exe:
- return False
+ return ""
try:
clang_repl_cmd = subprocess.Popen(
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ def run_clang_repl(args):
)
except OSError:
print("could not exec clang-repl")
- return False
+ return ""
clang_repl_out = clang_repl_cmd.stdout.read().decode("ascii")
clang_repl_cmd.wait()
|
mahesh-attarde
pushed a commit
to mahesh-attarde/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2025
On the happy path, when `clang-repl` is present, we will invoke it in order to determine if the host supports JIT features. That will return a string containing "true". However, in cases where `clang-repl` is not present or we fail to invoke it, we previously returned `False`, which would then trigger a failure with our substring check. This PR updates the function to return `""` instead, so the substring check is still valid. This is related to llvm#157359, where the original change was introduced.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On the happy path, when
clang-replis present, we will invoke it in order to determine if the host supports JIT features. That will return a string containing "true". However, in cases whereclang-replis not present or we fail to invoke it, we previously returnedFalse, which would then trigger a failure with our substring check. This PR updates the function to return""instead, so the substring check is still valid.This is related to #157359, where the original change was introduced.