Skip to content

[mlir][IR] Fix bug in AffineExpr simplifier lhs % rhs where lhs = lhs floordiv rhs#119245

Merged
christopherbate merged 1 commit into
llvm:mainfrom
christopherbate:mlir-affine-simplifier-fix
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

[mlir][IR] Fix bug in AffineExpr simplifier lhs % rhs where lhs = lhs floordiv rhs#119245
christopherbate merged 1 commit into
llvm:mainfrom
christopherbate:mlir-affine-simplifier-fix

Conversation

@christopherbate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes an issue where the SimpleAffineExprFlattener would simplify
lhs % rhs to just -(lhs floordiv rhs) instead of lhs - (lhs floordiv rhs)
if lhs happened to be equal to lhs floordiv rhs.

The reported failure case was (d0, d1) -> (((d1 - (d1 + 2)) floordiv 8) % 8)
from #114654.

Note that many paths that simplify AffineMaps (e.g. the AffineApplyOp
folder and canonicalization) would not observe this bug because of
of slightly different paths taken by the code. Slightly different grouping
of the terms could also result in avoiding the bug. The way to reproduce was
by constructing the map directly, replacing d1 with 1 and calling
mlir::simplifyAffineExpr.

Resolves #114654.

@llvmbot llvmbot added mlir:core MLIR Core Infrastructure mlir labels Dec 9, 2024
@llvmbot

llvmbot commented Dec 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core

Author: Christopher Bate (christopherbate)

Changes

Fixes an issue where the SimpleAffineExprFlattener would simplify
lhs % rhs to just -(lhs floordiv rhs) instead of lhs - (lhs floordiv rhs)
if lhs happened to be equal to lhs floordiv rhs.

The reported failure case was (d0, d1) -> (((d1 - (d1 + 2)) floordiv 8) % 8)
from #114654.

Note that many paths that simplify AffineMaps (e.g. the AffineApplyOp
folder and canonicalization) would not observe this bug because of
of slightly different paths taken by the code. Slightly different grouping
of the terms could also result in avoiding the bug. The way to reproduce was
by constructing the map directly, replacing d1 with 1 and calling
mlir::simplifyAffineExpr.

Resolves #114654.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119245.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/lib/IR/AffineExpr.cpp (+1-1)
  • (modified) mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp (+21)
diff --git a/mlir/lib/IR/AffineExpr.cpp b/mlir/lib/IR/AffineExpr.cpp
index 2291d64c50a560..59df0cd6833db3 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/IR/AffineExpr.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/IR/AffineExpr.cpp
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ LogicalResult SimpleAffineExprFlattener::visitModExpr(AffineBinaryOpExpr expr) {
     lhs[getLocalVarStartIndex() + numLocals - 1] = -rhsConst;
   } else {
     // Reuse the existing local id.
-    lhs[getLocalVarStartIndex() + loc] = -rhsConst;
+    lhs[getLocalVarStartIndex() + loc] -= rhsConst;
   }
   return success();
 }
diff --git a/mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp b/mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp
index 9e89a5b79e2e2e..7005b2004267c8 100644
--- a/mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp
+++ b/mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp
@@ -129,3 +129,24 @@ TEST(AffineExprTest, d0PlusD0FloorDivNeg2) {
   auto sum = d0 + d0.floorDiv(-2) * 2;
   ASSERT_EQ(toString(sum), "d0 + (d0 floordiv -2) * 2");
 }
+
+TEST(AffineExprTEst, simpleAffineExprFlattenerRegression) {
+
+  // Regression test for a bug where mod simplification was not handled
+  // properly when `lhs % rhs` was happened to have the property that `lhs
+  // floordiv rhs = lhs`.
+  MLIRContext ctx;
+  OpBuilder b(&ctx);
+
+  auto d0 = b.getAffineDimExpr(0);
+  auto d1 = b.getAffineDimExpr(1);
+
+  // Manually replace variables by constants to avoid constant folding.
+  AffineExpr expr = (d0 - (d1 + 2)).floorDiv(8) % 8;
+  expr = expr.replaceDims(
+      {b.getAffineConstantExpr(1), b.getAffineConstantExpr(1)});
+  AffineExpr result = mlir::simplifyAffineExpr(expr, 2, 0);
+
+  ASSERT_TRUE(isa<AffineConstantExpr>(result));
+  ASSERT_EQ(cast<AffineConstantExpr>(result).getValue(), 7);
+}
\ No newline at end of file

Comment thread mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp Outdated
Comment thread mlir/unittests/IR/AffineExprTest.cpp Outdated
Comment thread mlir/lib/IR/AffineExpr.cpp

@Groverkss Groverkss left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, please fix the test before landing.

@christopherbate christopherbate force-pushed the mlir-affine-simplifier-fix branch from 2d94312 to 8440285 Compare December 12, 2024 17:14
…lhs floordiv rhs`

Fixes an issue where the `SimpleAffineExprFlattener` would simplify
`lhs % rhs` to just `-(lhs floordiv rhs)` instead of `lhs - (lhs floordiv rhs)`
if `lhs` happened to be equal to `lhs floordiv rhs`.

The reported failure case was `(d0, d1) -> (((d1 - (d1 + 2)) floordiv 8) % 8)`
from llvm#114654.

Note that many paths that simplify AffineMaps (e.g. the AffineApplyOp
folder and canonicalization) would not observe this bug because of
of slightly different paths taken by the code. Slightly different grouping
of the terms could also result in avoiding the bug. The way to reproduce was
by constructing the map directly, replacing `d1` with `1` and calling
`mlir::simplifyAffineExpr`.

Resolves llvm#114654.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mlir:core MLIR Core Infrastructure mlir

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[mlir] Inconsistent results for affine.apply

3 participants