feat: Add p.value and p.precision arguments to fit_power_law() to control the computation of the p-value#1546
Conversation
Current Aviator status
This PR was merged using Aviator.
See the real-time status of this PR on the
Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension
to see the status of your PR within GitHub.
|
…led in `fit_power_law()` with the plfit method
p.value and p.precision arguments to fit_power_law() to control the computation of the p-value
|
This pull request can't be queued because it's currently a draft. |
|
This pull request failed to merge: some required checks failed. After you have resolved the problem, you should remove the Failed checks: Check ubuntu-20.04 (oldrel-2), Check ubuntu-20.04 (release) |
|
This pull request failed to merge: some required checks failed. After you have resolved the problem, you should remove the Failed checks: Check ubuntu-20.04 (oldrel-1), Check ubuntu-20.04 (oldrel-3) |
|
@krlmlr Thanks for taking this over! Let me know if you need any help/input from me specifically. |
…led in
fit_power_law()with the plfit methodThis PR is to help make quicker progress on #1158. It is not finished: a decision must be made on the interface of requesting a p-value calculation. Please see #1158 (comment)
Can someone please take this over from here?