feat: weight support for eccentricity() and radius()#1211
Conversation
Current Aviator status
This PR was merged manually (without Aviator). Merging manually can negatively impact the performance of the queue. Consider using Aviator next time.
See the real-time status of this PR on the
Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension
to see the status of your PR within GitHub.
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
686efe8 to
da90c2f
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
da90c2f to
84213ac
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
krlmlr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks.
- Is the order of functions in
functions-R.yamlconsistent with that offunctions.yaml? We probably want a simple test for that. - Can you please add tests for the new functions?
I'm fine with the PR the way it is, we can always refine later.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
a93e1b0 to
c60f7cd
Compare
I had a very quick look, seems fine as a smoke test, and yes, the test you added for |
Co-authored-by: Kirill Müller <krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@szhorvat could you please fix the conflicts in src/cpp11.cpp, or tell me how to fix them? Thank you! |
|
|
|
Needs the decor package. |
# Conflicts: # src/cpp11.cpp
|
I merged Does this mess up Aviator because it won't be able to rebase anymore? |
|
Aviator might be fine, I can't identify the reason why it sometimes fails to rebase. |
|
thanks both! |
|
This pull request failed to merge: PR cannot be automatically rebased, please rebase manually to continue. Remove the Additional debug info: Failed to rebase this PR onto the latest changes from the base branch. You will probably need to rebase this PR manually and resolve conflicts). |
Fixes #893