You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
No, there's none.
This whole thing started as me trying to understand BC compression better, and was never intended to be the fastest or best out there.
Thanks to @aras-p speed was improved, but I personally was never interested in "being the fastest" so never even though of implementing benchmarking.
But if you would like to implement it - by all means do it! I'll gladly accept it :)
Well, I guess for C I can just use some for loops.
I have some improvements I implemented in my own bc decoders as well, that could be useful here, esp with relation to the implied zeroes in bptc. Should make bc6 and 7 substantially faster (was a 30% diff in Java).
Activity
iOrange commentedon Oct 23, 2025
Hi!
No, there's none.
This whole thing started as me trying to understand BC compression better, and was never intended to be the fastest or best out there.
Thanks to @aras-p speed was improved, but I personally was never interested in "being the fastest" so never even though of implementing benchmarking.
But if you would like to implement it - by all means do it! I'll gladly accept it :)
jandk commentedon Nov 3, 2025
Well, I guess for C I can just use some for loops.
I have some improvements I implemented in my own bc decoders as well, that could be useful here, esp with relation to the implied zeroes in bptc. Should make bc6 and 7 substantially faster (was a 30% diff in Java).