Give up Ajv they said. RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded.

[coderextreme]

See attached schema and instance.

x3d-4.1-JSONSchema.json

StackOverflow.zip

Error caught problem with file HumanoidComplete.json RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
at BasicOutputPlugin.afterKeyword (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/evaluation-plugins/basic-output.js:24:28)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:88:30)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/properties.js:24:23)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/oneOf.js:17:20)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/ref.js:7:43)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/properties.js:24:23)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
Error caught problem with file HumanoidCompleteShort.json RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
at BasicOutputPlugin.afterKeyword (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/evaluation-plugins/basic-output.js:24:28)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:88:30)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/properties.js:24:23)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/oneOf.js:17:20)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/ref.js:7:43)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/properties.js:24:23)
at Object.interpret (file:///C:/Users/jcarl/x3dvalidate/node_modules/@hyperjump/json-schema/lib/keywords/validation.js:82:38)

[jdesrosiers]

Wow, 50MB is a huge instance! I tried this out. It looks like error collection is the straw that breaks it. With FLAG output, it works. Thanks for sharing the data. It's difficult to debug with a document that's so big it crashes every editor I threw at it, but it's already providing some insight.

Have you considered that JavaScript probably isn't the right tool at these scales?

[jdesrosiers]

It seems that DETAILED output works, but it's impractical to use at this scale.

[jdesrosiers]

The schema found over 1.7 million errors in the data! This package is definitely not designed to function at these scales.

[coderextreme]

Once I fixed errors, your package worked. Try jsonlint -t 0.

…

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 6:16 PM Jason Desrosiers ***@***.***> wrote: *jdesrosiers* left a comment (hyperjump-io/json-schema.hyperjump.io#41) <#41 (comment)> The schema found over 1.7 million errors in the data! This package is definitely not designed to function at these scales. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#41?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFMJ52O7KRMU2F2GGXSQRT4RR5VRA5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIMBZGQYDENZYGIYKM4TFMFZW63VGMF2XI2DPOKSWK5TFNZ2KYZTPN52GK4S7MNWGSY3L#issuecomment-4094027820>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFMJ5Y6P3F2DCKGGMXRC5T4RR5VRAVCNFSM6AAAAACWXQ2QZCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHM2DAOJUGAZDOOBSGA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[coderextreme]

Yes, Ajv only showed a few. John

…

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 6:16 PM Jason Desrosiers ***@***.***> wrote: *jdesrosiers* left a comment (hyperjump-io/json-schema.hyperjump.io#41) <#41 (comment)> The schema found over 1.7 million errors in the data! This package is definitely not designed to function at these scales. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#41?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFMJ52O7KRMU2F2GGXSQRT4RR5VRA5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIMBZGQYDENZYGIYKM4TFMFZW63VGMF2XI2DPOKSWK5TFNZ2KYZTPN52GK4S7MNWGSY3L#issuecomment-4094027820>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFMJ5Y6P3F2DCKGGMXRC5T4RR5VRAVCNFSM6AAAAACWXQ2QZCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHM2DAOJUGAZDOOBSGA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>