Skip to content

feat(api-client): P001 - Increase CustomApplicationSettings content limit validation#1328

Open
yenkins-admin wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/auto-P001-increase-custom-app-settings-limit
Open

feat(api-client): P001 - Increase CustomApplicationSettings content limit validation#1328
yenkins-admin wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/auto-P001-increase-custom-app-settings-limit

Conversation

@yenkins-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Add maxLength: 250000 validation to DeclarativeCustomApplicationSetting content field.
Jira ticket creation skipped - sandbox under maintenance at time of PR creation.
Problem: P001 | Workflow: https://github.com/gooddata/gdc-nas/actions/runs/22069292236

Changes

Updated the DeclarativeCustomApplicationSetting model to include maxLength: 250000 validation in the validations dict for the content field. This matches the OpenAPI spec change from gdc-nas commit bee16eb300b19dd96bd59ee9e0325c2101c8207c.

Context

In gdc-nas, the CustomApplicationSettings content field maxLength was increased from 15000 to 250000 characters to support larger LDM layouts (fixes STL-2278). The OpenAPI spec was updated to include this validation, but the SDK model was missing the validation enforcement.

Related

  • Problem: P001
  • gdc-nas commits: bee16eb300b19dd96bd59ee9e0325c2101c8207c
  • Related Jira: STL-2278, STL-1337

…gs content

Update DeclarativeCustomApplicationSetting model to include maxLength: 250000
validation for the content field, matching the OpenAPI spec change from gdc-nas
commit bee16eb300b19dd96bd59ee9e0325c2101c8207c.

This ensures the SDK properly validates content size limits for custom
application settings, which was increased from 15000 to 250000 characters
to support larger LDM layouts.

Related: STL-2278, P001

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tychtjan
Copy link

Workflow run -> I don't think it is relevant :D I need to finetune my prompt for analysis

@tychtjan
Copy link

  ╔═════════════════════════════╗                                      
  ║  ⚠️ CLOSE PLEASE            ║                                    
  ║  Tinkering with agent 🚀    ║
  ╚═════════════════════════════╝

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants