Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[evoskill] Refine resolve-merge-conflicts skill: detect leftover conflict markers #57601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[evoskill] Refine resolve-merge-conflicts skill: detect leftover conflict markers #57601
Changes from all commits
b5af2a2File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[/diagnosing-bugs] The scan covers only
maxdepth 1under.github/workflows/, but skill YAML frontmatter in.github/skills/**/*.mdcould also receive manual conflict resolution and carry the same stray-marker risk. The observed failure was in a workflow.md, so the current scope is correct for the reported bug — worth documenting why the boundary is intentional.💡 Consider a comment explaining the scope boundary
A comment next to the
findcall would prevent future "why don't we also scan skills?" questions:@copilot please address this.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.