Persona Overview
- Agent: agentic-workflows
- Personas This Run: Program Manager, Designer, Legal / Compliance
- Scenarios Tested: 4
- Average Quality Score: 4.5/5.0
Key Findings
- The guidance strongly favors
schedule for digest/report use cases and pull_request with paths: for scoped review tasks.
- Recommendations were consistently aligned with read-only jobs plus safe outputs for any GitHub writes.
- Non-technical personas still mapped cleanly to concrete patterns, especially Program Manager and compliance review cases.
- Deduplication and explicit
noop criteria were a recurring strength in report-style scenarios.
- The weakest area was specificity for less-common monthly compliance digest framing versus weekly or PR-scoped examples.
Top Patterns
- Most common trigger types:
schedule for recurring digests; pull_request with narrow paths: filters for design/compliance review.
- Most recommended tools: GitHub read tooling as the default; optional
cache-memory only when history/baselines matter.
- Security practices observed: read-only agent posture, writes via safe outputs, constrained scope, and explicit
noop handling.
View High Quality Responses (Top 2-3)
- PM1 — Strong recommendation for weekly scheduling, preview/backfill via
workflow_dispatch, issue deduplication, and empty-window noop behavior.
- LC1 — Best overall response; tightly scoped PR review, policy-tier classification, and escalation only when findings require team-wide follow-up.
- DS1 — Good PR-scoped design-governance pattern with path filters and PR-local feedback via comment-safe output.
View Areas for Improvement (Top 2-3)
- LC2 was adequate but less specific on how to structure a monthly policy-change digest beyond the standard scheduled-report pattern.
- Some scenario guidance would benefit from more concrete sample
paths: filters for manifests, policy files, and design-token sources.
- Ad hoc evaluation recommendations could more consistently include grouping dimensions and sample dedup keys in the first pass.
Recommendations (Top 3 only)
- Add another non-technical compliance digest example to
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md, especially for monthly policy/security-summary use cases.
- Expand
.github/aw/triggers.md or .github/aw/create-agentic-workflow-trigger-details.md with clearer example paths: filters for dependency and policy-review workflows.
- Tighten
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md ad hoc evaluation guidance so compact scenario answers always include report window, grouping, and dedup key details.
Generated by 🎭 Agent Persona Explorer · pi · gpt54 · 19.1 AIC · ⌖ 9.08 AIC · ⊞ 7.9K · ◷
Persona Overview
Key Findings
schedulefor digest/report use cases andpull_requestwithpaths:for scoped review tasks.noopcriteria were a recurring strength in report-style scenarios.Top Patterns
schedulefor recurring digests;pull_requestwith narrowpaths:filters for design/compliance review.cache-memoryonly when history/baselines matter.noophandling.View High Quality Responses (Top 2-3)
workflow_dispatch, issue deduplication, and empty-windownoopbehavior.View Areas for Improvement (Top 2-3)
paths:filters for manifests, policy files, and design-token sources.Recommendations (Top 3 only)
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md, especially for monthly policy/security-summary use cases..github/aw/triggers.mdor.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow-trigger-details.mdwith clearer examplepaths:filters for dependency and policy-review workflows..github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdad hoc evaluation guidance so compact scenario answers always include report window, grouping, and dedup key details.