Today's Detection Analysis Report (2026-08-09→10, discussion #51652) flagged 2 workflows as misconfigured under Rule 1 (no gh-aw-detection feature configured at all despite running frequently):
| Workflow |
Runs (7d) |
File |
| Q |
5 |
.github/workflows/q.md |
| ESLint Monster |
7 |
.github/workflows/eslint-monster.md |
Fix
Add to each workflow's frontmatter:
features:
gh-aw-detection: true
then recompile (gh aw compile) to regenerate the .lock.yml files.
Why it matters
gh-aw-detection is the fleet's prompt-injection/threat-detection layer. Detection-enabled runs in this same report showed a 90.9% success rate vs. 25.0% for non-detection runs (though that gap is mostly explained by action_required gate blocks, not detection itself) — the broader pattern across the fleet is that workflows named/behaving like analyzers, reviewers, or monitors are expected to have this enabled, and these two are the only 2 exceptions found in the sampled window.
Data source
Detection Analysis Report, discussion #51652, 2026-08-10.
Suggested Agent: New Agent or general code-quality agent
Estimated Effort: Fast (< 30 min)
Generated by 🔬 Deep Report · agent · 237.7 AIC · ⌖ 55.3 AIC · ⊞ 11.3K · ◷
Today's Detection Analysis Report (2026-08-09→10, discussion #51652) flagged 2 workflows as misconfigured under Rule 1 (no
gh-aw-detectionfeature configured at all despite running frequently):.github/workflows/q.md.github/workflows/eslint-monster.mdFix
Add to each workflow's frontmatter:
then recompile (
gh aw compile) to regenerate the.lock.ymlfiles.Why it matters
gh-aw-detectionis the fleet's prompt-injection/threat-detection layer. Detection-enabled runs in this same report showed a 90.9% success rate vs. 25.0% for non-detection runs (though that gap is mostly explained byaction_requiredgate blocks, not detection itself) — the broader pattern across the fleet is that workflows named/behaving like analyzers, reviewers, or monitors are expected to have this enabled, and these two are the only 2 exceptions found in the sampled window.Data source
Detection Analysis Report, discussion #51652, 2026-08-10.
Suggested Agent: New Agent or general code-quality agent
Estimated Effort: Fast (< 30 min)