[Outcome Report] Workflow Health Report — 2026-07-19

[github-actions]

Workflow Health — 2026-07-19

Executive read: Strong acceptance rate (100%) but 14 items remain pending/unresolved; most work concentrated in PR Sous Chef.

Workflow	Status	Lifecycle health	References
PR Sous Chef	🟨⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜	🟡 in flight	🟨 #46494 · ⬜ — · 🟩 #46493 · 🟩 #46421 · 🟩 #46421 ... +10 more
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	🟨🟨⬜	🟡 in flight	🟨 — · 🟨 — · ⬜ #46493
PR Code Quality Reviewer	🟨🟨🟨	🟡 in flight	🟨 — · 🟨 — · 🟨 #46493
Impeccable Skills Reviewer	⬜	⚪ underdefined	⬜ #46493
Test Quality Sentinel	🟩⬜	🟡 in flight	🟩 #46493 · ⬜ #46493
Daily Model Inventory Checker	🟨	🟡 in flight	🟨 #46497
Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway	⬜	🟢 resolving	⬜ #46495
Daily Sentrux Report	⬜	🟢 resolving	⬜ #46496

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined
• References: one linked item per status emoji, in the same order as the Status column

🔴 Action Items

1. Highest-waste workflows: All workflows show 0% waste rate — no concerning patterns. Rejection mechanisms are not active.

2. Stuck pending items:

   • PR Sous Chef: 46057 pending ~1.3h
   • PR Code Quality Reviewer: 3 pending items <1.5h each
   • Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer: 2 pending items <1.3h each

3. Underdefined workflows: Impeccable Skills Reviewer shows 100% unknown outcomes — acceptance/rejection criteria need clarification or dedicated evaluator.

4. Low zero-touch workflows: 0 / 11 accepted items required zero human edits — excellent output quality overall.

5. High ignored rate: 7% of outcomes (2 discussion items) received no engagement — discussions appear to be low-traffic targets; consider refining discussion selection or output format.

6. Data quality: 0 item(s) evaluated with generic existence check (0% of total) — no signal degradation.

Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-07-19

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	100%	🟢 >80% / 🟡 60-80% / 🔴 <60%
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴 >50% / 🟡 25-50% / 🔴 <25%
Waste rate	0%	🟢 <10% / 🟡 10-25% / 🔴 >25%
Median time to resolution	—	—
Accepted	11 / 27	—
— strong evidence	0	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	11	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	2	no observable follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 11	—
Pending	8	—
Runs checked	11	—

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Accepted	Rejected	Ignored	Pending	Acceptance	Waste
PR Sous Chef	10	0	0	2	100%	0%
PR Code Quality Reviewer	0	0	0	3	100%	0%
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	0	0	0	2	100%	0%
Impeccable Skills Reviewer	0	0	0	0	100%	0%
Test Quality Sentinel	1	0	0	0	100%	0%
Daily Model Inventory Checker	0	0	0	1	100%	0%
Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway	0	0	1	0	100%	0%
Daily Sentrux Report	0	0	1	0	100%	0%

Trend Signal

First report cycle — no baseline for comparison. Established baseline for future trend analysis:

• Acceptance rate: 100%
• Zero-touch rate: 0%
• Waste rate: 0%
• Per-workflow pending/unknown counts established for lifecycle health tracking

Warning

Firewall blocked 1 domain

The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

• awmgmcpg

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "awmgmcpg"

See Network Configuration for more information.

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · 15 AIC · ⌖ 3.21 AIC · ⊞ 6.8K

• expires on Jul 25, 2026, 4:34 PM UTC-08:00

[github-actions]

This issue is being closed as outdated. A newer issue has been created: #47164

View newer issue

---

This action was performed automatically by the Outcome Collector workflow.