[performance] Regression in Validation: 29.2% slower

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Regression Detected

Benchmark: Validation

Current Performance: 62,110 ns/op (62.11μs)
Historical Average: 48,088 ns/op (48.09μs)
Change: +29.2% slower

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

• ns/op: 62,110 (was 48,088)
• Change: +29.2%
• Memory: 2,834 B/op
• Allocations: 56 allocs/op
• Historical Data Points: 2

Baseline Targets

• Simple workflows: <100ms
• Complex workflows: <500ms
• MCP-heavy workflows: <1s

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Review recent changes to the workflow validation logic
2. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles
3. Use go tool pprof to identify hotspots
4. Compare with previous benchmark results: benchstat

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: 27560704644
• Date: 2026-06-15
• Workflow: Daily CLI Performance

---

Automatically generated by Daily CLI Performance workflow

Generated by ⚡ Daily CLI Performance Agent · 240.1 AIC · ⌖ 26.5 AIC · ⊞ 23.4K · ◷

• expires on Jun 17, 2026, 8:36 AM UTC-08:00

[copilot-swe-agent]

The agent encountered an error and was unable to start working on this issue: Please try again later, or contact support if the problem persists. (Request id: 1480:36EE5B:B1BBF5:2A25F83:6A30640F)

[github-actions]

🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot

I have identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and assigned it to the Copilot coding agent.

The agent will investigate the validation performance regression and create a pull request with optimizations to restore performance.

Om nom nom! 🍪

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · 38.8 AIC · ⌖ 15.7 AIC · ⊞ 24.7K · ◷

[github-actions]

This issue was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-06-17T16:36:33.551Z.

Closed by Workflow