Expose exact typed result recovery evidence

[flyingrobots]

Exposes complete schema-neutral application-result records from applied execution, fresh-host recovery, and recovered WAL state through one fail-closed equality gate. Adds negative substitution coverage and the external three-way comparison contract.

Validation: xtask 132/132; generic runner 9/9; affected Clippy, formatting, documentation, and pre-push checks green.

Closes #702.

[flyingrobots]

@coderabbitai review

[flyingrobots]

@codex please review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@flyingrobots, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 5 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: cc0639e6-2ca9-46e5-8fe8-148cc4eb024b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28d7a0f and 423f9a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• CHANGELOG.md
• README.md
• docs/topics/GeneratedRules.md
• xtask/src/run_edict_operation.rs
• xtask/tests/run_edict_operation.rs

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please!

Reviewed commit: 423f9a16c5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[flyingrobots]

Merge gate: current head 423f9a1 is clean locally; every reported check passed; Codex found no major issues; CodeRabbit completed with an explicit rate-limit response; zero review threads are unresolved. The repository is solo-maintained and the available review metadata cannot supply an independent human approval, so criteria 1–4 substitute for human approval under the recorded operator authorization.