Skip to content

Revert "[API/YAML] Contributor API docs for 30871 (#45618)" - #46940

Merged
rachaelshaw merged 1 commit into
docs-v4.87.0from
JM-docs-4.87.0-revert-30871
Jun 5, 2026
Merged

rachaelshaw merged 1 commit into
docs-v4.87.0from
JM-docs-4.87.0-revert-30871

Conversation

@JordanMontgomery

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Reverts #30871 changes to contributor/what API endpoints to expose docs - it's moved to v4.88

Issue #30871 (default fleet for BYOD iOS/iPadOS hosts) moved from v4.87 to
v4.88, so its contributor API docs should not ship in v4.87.

This reverts the article endpoint bullets and the token-scoped
account_driven_enroll / service_discovery endpoint sections cleanly.

The ab_token/abm_token response shapes were later restructured by #46667
(abm->ab rename, issue #42508), which built on #45618's _fleet fields.
Conflicts there were resolved by stripping only the BYOD-specific fields
(byod_fleet, byod_team, byod_fleet_id) while preserving #46667's
restructure and the macos/ios/ipados _fleet renames.

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Claude Code Review

This repository is configured for manual code reviews. Comment @claude review to trigger a review and subscribe this PR to future pushes, or @claude review once for a one-time review.

Tip: disable this comment in your organization's Code Review settings.

@rachaelshaw
rachaelshaw merged commit 70b4d07 into docs-v4.87.0 Jun 5, 2026
6 checks passed
@rachaelshaw
rachaelshaw deleted the JM-docs-4.87.0-revert-30871 branch June 5, 2026 22:37
rachaelshaw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2026
#30871 v4.88 docs

same docs being reverted here from v4.87
#46940

This branch was previously deployed

1 inactive deployment
Docker Hub — c56e0c76 Deployed Jun 5, 2026 by JordanMontgomery via publish #92190
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants