You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Expose partial locale data for smaller bundle size #3590
Currently anything inside a locale object such as en is never tree shaken even if you only need one submodule/language file from it. This applies also if you manually deconstruct and reassemble it.
Alt1) Provide other ways to access subsets of locales.
Alt2) Combine #2667 with pre-built per locale nano instances.
Additional context
No response
Reacted by github-actions, ST-DDT, Thomas Jakemeyn, Lucas Veber de Brida, chulanovskyi-bs, Vitalii Bedletskyi, Ivan, Taras Dubyk, Sylvie Paindeville, Vitalii Yarmus and 7 more
We marked it as "waiting for user interest" for now to gather some feedback from our community:
If you would like to see this feature be implemented, please react to the description with an up-vote (:+1:).
If you have a suggestion or want to point out some special cases that need to be considered, please leave a comment, so we are aware about them.
We would also like to hear about other community members' use cases for the feature to give us a better understanding of their potential implicit or explicit requirements.
We will start the implementation based on:
the number of votes ( 👍 ) and comments
the relevance for the ecosystem
availability of alternatives and workarounds
and the complexity of the requested feature
We do this because:
There are plenty of languages/countries out there and we would like to ensure that every method can cover all or almost all of them.
Every feature we add to faker has "costs" associated to it:
Activity
github-actions commentedon Aug 14, 2025
Thank you for your feature proposal.
We marked it as "waiting for user interest" for now to gather some feedback from our community:
We would also like to hear about other community members' use cases for the feature to give us a better understanding of their potential implicit or explicit requirements.
We will start the implementation based on:
We do this because:
View more issues which are waiting for user interest
ST-DDT commentedon Jul 11, 2026
This now has 17 updates, maybe we can work on this in/for v11.