Skip to content

fix(spec-specs,tests): keep the blob schedule unchanged at Bogota - #3871

Merged
fselmo merged 3 commits into
ethereum:eips/bogota/eip-8198from
barnabasbusa:bbusa/eip8198-blob-schedule-via-bpo
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

fselmo merged 3 commits into
ethereum:eips/bogota/eip-8198from
barnabasbusa:bbusa/eip8198-blob-schedule-via-bpo

Conversation

@barnabasbusa

@barnabasbusa barnabasbusa commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

EIP-8198 shortens the slot duration while keeping fee dynamics per unit of wall-clock time close to their previous values, and leaves the blob change to an EIP-7892 BLOB_SCHEDULE entry scheduled with the slot duration change (made explicit in ethereum/EIPs#12552, which drops the provisional blob values from the EIP). #3703 instead hardcoded the provisional target 12, maximum 18 and update fraction 12018519 as Bogota fork constants, so they apply even on networks that keep 12-second slots, and clients copying it (ethrex, reth, geth) ignore the genesis BPO chain from Bogota on; in a local run of the heze-devnet-2 configuration this split Besu, which follows EIP-7892, from ethrex and reth at the first Bogota block with blobs. This keeps Bogota's blob constants inherited like any named fork after Prague, leaving the blob change to a BPO scheduled alongside the slot duration change, and removes the tests that asserted the hardcoded values; the remaining EIP-8198 suite (144) and the Bogota blob suites (tests/cancun/eip4844_blobs/test_excess_blob_gas.py, tests/osaka/eip7918_blob_reserve_price, 9470) fill cleanly.

EIP-8198 pairs a slot duration change with an EIP-7892 blob schedule entry
at the upgrade, so Bogota inherits the blob target, maximum and update
fraction like any named fork after Prague. Drop the provisional 12/18 values
from the fork and the tests that asserted them.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (eips/bogota/eip-8198@bb77b52). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##             eips/bogota/eip-8198    #3871   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                        ?   95.01%           
=======================================================
  Files                           ?      673           
  Lines                           ?    40891           
  Branches                        ?     3769           
=======================================================
  Hits                            ?    38854           
  Misses                          ?     1424           
  Partials                        ?      613           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.01% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Rewrite the removed blob transition tests to check that the fork block keeps the parent fork's blob target, maximum, and update fraction, and mark the block-level constraint section not applicable.
Remove the sentences describing the EIP-7892 entry, which this EIP no longer carries, and take the fork block's blob counts from the new fork as the other transition tests do.

@fselmo fselmo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ty!

@fselmo
fselmo merged commit 100c3ee into ethereum:eips/bogota/eip-8198 Oct 20, 2026
23 checks passed
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2026
)

* fix(spec-specs,tests): keep the blob schedule unchanged at Bogota

EIP-8198 pairs a slot duration change with an EIP-7892 blob schedule entry
at the upgrade, so Bogota inherits the blob target, maximum and update
fraction like any named fork after Prague. Drop the provisional 12/18 values
from the fork and the tests that asserted them.

* feat(tests): pin the blob schedule unchanged at the Bogota fork

Rewrite the removed blob transition tests to check that the fork block keeps the parent fork's blob target, maximum, and update fraction, and mark the block-level constraint section not applicable.

* refactor(test-forks,tests): drop the blob schedule entry mentions

Remove the sentences describing the EIP-7892 entry, which this EIP no longer carries, and take the fork block's blob counts from the new fork as the other transition tests do.

---------

Co-authored-by: fselmo <fselmo2@gmail.com>
@spencer-tb spencer-tb mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2026
8 tasks done
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants