You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary: Add a previous-findings-limit input to scheduled workflows so maintainers can increase dedupe history depth beyond the current hardcoded 100 issues.
Why a Customer Would Want This
Teams running many scheduled detectors over long periods want low-noise issue filing. With a fixed 100-item history window, older findings can fall out of dedupe scope and be re-filed, creating avoidable operational noise.
Rough Implementation Sketch
Add previous-findings-limit (default 100) to .github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-audit.md and .github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-fix.mdworkflow_call inputs.
Wire that input into the gh issue list --limit ... step that writes /tmp/previous-findings.json.
Mirror the same input/usage in .github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/previous-findings.md guidance.
Document when to raise this value in gh-agent-workflows/scheduled-audit/README.md and gh-agent-workflows/scheduled-fix/README.md.
Why It Won't Be That Hard
The change is small and localized: existing dedupe plumbing already exists in scheduled workflows and fragment guidance, and this only parameterizes a hardcoded limit plus docs.
Evidence
.github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-audit.md lines 86-99: previous findings query is hardcoded to --limit 100.
.github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-fix.md lines 88-100: same hardcoded --limit 100 pattern.
.github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/previous-findings.md lines 3-15: shared previous-findings fetch also hardcoded to --limit 100.
gh-agent-workflows/README.md lines 67-80: many continuous-improvement scheduled workflows are commonly installed, increasing dedupe-history needs over time.
Related (not duplicate): open issue #987 proposes fail-closed behavior when previous-findings fetch fails; it does not address configurable history depth.
Note
🔒 Integrity filter blocked 37 items
The following items were blocked because they don't meet the GitHub integrity level.
#937search_pull_requests: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
#1067search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
#359search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
Mint Ephemeral Tokens #1067list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
Feature Idea
Summary: Add a
previous-findings-limitinput to scheduled workflows so maintainers can increase dedupe history depth beyond the current hardcoded 100 issues.Why a Customer Would Want This
Teams running many scheduled detectors over long periods want low-noise issue filing. With a fixed 100-item history window, older findings can fall out of dedupe scope and be re-filed, creating avoidable operational noise.
Rough Implementation Sketch
previous-findings-limit(default100) to.github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-audit.mdand.github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-fix.mdworkflow_callinputs.gh issue list --limit ...step that writes/tmp/previous-findings.json..github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/previous-findings.mdguidance.gh-agent-workflows/scheduled-audit/README.mdandgh-agent-workflows/scheduled-fix/README.md.Why It Won't Be That Hard
The change is small and localized: existing dedupe plumbing already exists in scheduled workflows and fragment guidance, and this only parameterizes a hardcoded limit plus docs.
Evidence
.github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-audit.mdlines 86-99: previous findings query is hardcoded to--limit 100..github/workflows/gh-aw-scheduled-fix.mdlines 88-100: same hardcoded--limit 100pattern..github/workflows/gh-aw-fragments/previous-findings.mdlines 3-15: shared previous-findings fetch also hardcoded to--limit 100.gh-agent-workflows/README.mdlines 67-80: many continuous-improvement scheduled workflows are commonly installed, increasing dedupe-history needs over time.#987proposes fail-closed behavior when previous-findings fetch fails; it does not address configurable history depth.Note
🔒 Integrity filter blocked 37 items
The following items were blocked because they don't meet the GitHub integrity level.
search_pull_requests: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".To allow these resources, lower
min-integrityin your GitHub frontmatter:What is this? | From workflow: Trigger Product Manager Impersonator
Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.