double-check acccessibility

[ynnig]

Feedback is that the font isn't too accessible for visually impaired users, and screen magnifiers don't like the pop-up menus. Screen readers seem fine. Zach, could you look into this?

[cazinc]

Hi @ynnig can you give me a bit more info on these things:

• Font: is it size, colour, actual typeface, or something else that is an issue? The typeface itself is a brand requirement I think?
• Popup menus: where exactly does this refer to?

Cheers!

Z.

[JonathanClarkDOIF]

I’ve asked RaymondYou’ll see I suggested we do a zoom call with him sharing his screen and talking us through his feedback. Hoping there might be some quick & easy things we can do to help while storing up the bigger stuff for a later release. Paula mentioned that of course we don’t want to react disproportionately to a single person and we haven’t had any other accessibility feedback yet. Let me know what you thinkJJonathan Clark & Partners B.V.Email: ***@***.***: +31 6 54733572On 6 Mar 2023, at 11:15, Zach Anthony ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @ynnig can you give me a bit more info on these things: Font: is it size, colour, actual typeface, or something else that is an issue? The typeface itself is a brand requirement I think? Popup menus: where exactly does this refer to? Cheers! Z. —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[cazinc]

Great, thanks @JonathanClarkDOIF. Let's leave this for now then pending further feedback from that meeting. This might point to some small tweaks to the website design and branding that would be acceptable and resolve a sufficiently large number of issues, or it might confirm that an alternate, stripped-down high contrast option for visitors like Raymond is the way forward.