As mentioned in merge #197, jumping to message by number now correctly passes the index (or next valid index, if that particular slot is deleted) to readNew(), and scanSub() is handling the modified scan_ptr method well for finding the particular slot to start. The only problem at this point seems to be that message scan is entered in reverse...
That's what's for dinner.
As mentioned in merge #197, jumping to message by number now correctly passes the index (or next valid index, if that particular slot is deleted) to
readNew(), andscanSub()is handling the modified scan_ptr method well for finding the particular slot to start. The only problem at this point seems to be that message scan is entered in reverse...That's what's for dinner.