Repository navigation
feat: implement issue #222 — Compliance: non-stub-feature-ideation.yml #234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
66fafc0
feat: implement issue #222 — Compliance: non-stub-feature-ideation.yml
donpetry-bot 9156b7d
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot ca8f1fb
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot 4ff4d3a
Merge branch 'main' into dev-lead/issue-222-20260530-1356
don-petry 6d3d05d
Merge branch 'main' into dev-lead/issue-222-20260530-1356
don-petry cf25711
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot 39a68c8
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot 863baeb
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot f219b47
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot b3a4b70
Merge branch 'main' into dev-lead/issue-222-20260530-1356
don-petry ffb2159
fix(bot): address bot feedback [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot 2eb4032
chore: apply manual instructions [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot 9759f92
fix(bot): address bot feedback [skip ci-relay]
donpetry-bot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ build/ | |
| .DS_Store | ||
| Thumbs.db | ||
| .dev-lead/ | ||
| .dev-lead/ | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment was added to reflect that the reusable workflow now needs the Actions API scope, but the permission is not actually granted below. The called
feature-ideation-reusable.yml@v1gather job declaresactions: read, and GitHub's reusable-workflow permission model only lets called workflows downgrade the caller'sGITHUB_TOKENpermissions, not elevate them; with this caller omittingactions: read, scheduled/manual runs that perform workflow/run introspection for the feed checkpoint will run without the required scope and can fail before analysis. Addactions: readto this job'spermissions:block.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.