Repository navigation
feat: implement issue #601 — [Phase 1] Express untracked (non-issue) prerequisites as an epic checklist - #734
Conversation
…prerequisites as an epic checklist
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 38 minutes and 12 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces support for "Untracked prerequisites" in the initiative planner. It updates the JSON schema to include an untracked_prerequisites array under the epic properties, processes these prerequisites in apply-plan.sh to render them as a checklist in the epic body, and adds corresponding test coverage. The reviewer pointed out that appending the untracked prerequisites after the footer is added places the footer in the middle of the description, and provided a code suggestion to ensure the footer remains at the bottom.
Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (applied)Changes committed and pushed. |
Dev-Lead — waiting on PR blockers (intent: review-changes)PR: #734 |
|
Note @don-petry I reviewed this PR and no code changes were needed, but it still has blocking checks or reviews (failing or cancelled checks, or changes-requested reviews), so I cannot mark it done yet. I'll re-check automatically. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 423d44671c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (applied)Changes committed and pushed. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Dev-Lead — waiting on PR blockers (intent: review-changes)PR: #734 |
|
Note @don-petry I reviewed this PR and no code changes were needed, but it still has blocking checks or reviews (failing or cancelled checks, or changes-requested reviews), so I cannot mark it done yet. I'll re-check automatically. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
|
Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (no-changes)Agent reasoning |



Closes #601
Implemented by dev-lead agent. Please review.