[don-petry]

Automated README refresh

Regenerated the org meta-repo README(s) in petry-projects/.github-private from live org state
(repository list, standards docs, agent profiles, and installed frameworks).

Generated by the weekly readme-refresh workflow in petry-projects/.github-private.
Review the diff — curated prose is preserved; only missing/stale facts are corrected.

Action needed: these repos have empty GitHub descriptions — set them on the repo page so future refreshes can enrich the table: TalkTerm, markets

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@don-petry, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 40 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 133240f2-c6af-4bfa-aaf3-548543efdc35

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b6c512 and ccf66f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md
• profile/README.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/readme-refresh

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a detailed 'Standards' section to README.md and expands the existing standards table in profile/README.md with key subtopics to improve discoverability. The feedback suggests correcting a sentence in README.md that incorrectly claims the listed standards link directly to documents, as they are currently plain text.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates the org meta-repo READMEs with refreshed “standards” information to improve discoverability of engineering standards and their key subtopics.

Changes:

• Added a new Standards section to the repo root README.md with a standards → subtopics table.
• Expanded the standards table in profile/README.md to include a third column summarizing key sections within each standard.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
README.md	Adds a new “Standards” section with a standards/subtopics table.
profile/README.md	Enriches the standards table with “Key sections” details for each standard.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (applied)

Changes committed and pushed.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — waiting on PR blockers (intent: fix-reviews)

PR: #1239
No changes were committed, but the PR still has blocking checks or reviews (failing or cancelled checks, or changes-requested reviews). The retry cron will re-attempt automatically. Next attempt after: 2026-07-14T22:32:33Z

[donpetry-bot]

Automated review — APPROVED ✓

Risk: LOW
Reviewed commit: ccf66f5b1cf76bb44f79844e16946202821c62fc
Review mode: triage-approved (single reviewer)

Summary

Docs-only automated README refresh: adds a Standards table to README.md and enriches the standards table in profile/README.md with key-section summaries. Triage's low-risk assessment is confirmed. Both prior bot review comments (inaccurate 'links to a doc' wording) were fixed in ccf66f5 and their threads are resolved. No code, workflow, or secret-bearing content is touched.

Linked issue analysis

No linked issues — this is the scheduled weekly readme-refresh workflow output. The PR body's stated scope (regenerate READMEs from live org state) matches the diff exactly.

Findings

• No security, correctness, or maintainability issues found in the markdown changes.
• Prior review feedback (gemini-code-assist, Copilot) about the table claiming links where there were none was addressed by rewording in commit ccf66f5; both threads resolved.
• MCP secret-scanning tool unavailable in this run; the gitleaks CI check passed and the diff contains only documentation text.
• PR body notes two repos (TalkTerm, markets) with empty GitHub descriptions — informational, no action required for this PR.

CI status

All latest check runs green: Lint, ShellCheck, Agent Security Scan, Secret scan (gitleaks), Compile agentic workflows, unit-tests, CodeQL (actions/python), SonarCloud (quality gate passed), AgentShield, holdout-guard, Test-Deletion Guard, CodeRabbit. Earlier CANCELLED dev-lead/review runs were superseded by later successful runs of the same checks; SKIPPED dependency-audit jobs are expected (no matching ecosystems).

---

Reviewed automatically by the PR-review agent (single-reviewer mode: fable 5). Reply if you need a human review.