Skip to content

ci: repin ci-failure-analyst → @ci-failure-analyst/stable (#1159) - #1166

Merged
don-petry merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
repin-ci-failure-analyst-stable-1159
Jul 11, 2026
Merged

don-petry merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
repin-ci-failure-analyst-stable-1159

Conversation

@don-petry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Versioning rollout #1159: ci-failure-analyst now has an immutable v1.0.0 + moving channel tags. Repin this consumer from a raw main SHA to the @ci-failure-analyst/stable channel so it gets gated, rollback-able releases.

combsmith/.github#659 registered it in canary-rings.json.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 11, 2026 02:47
@don-petry
don-petry requested a review from a team as a code owner July 11, 2026 02:47
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@don-petry, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 41 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 92d6ef97-e9c8-4f74-bbc4-a21823fdb7ab

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc0bc61 and acd7dc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • templates/ci-failure-analyst.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch repin-ci-failure-analyst-stable-1159

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request deletes the templates/ci-failure-analyst.yml workflow template file. The reviewer noted that this deletion is likely unintended, as the goal should be to repin the workflow to the @ci-failure-analyst/stable channel rather than deleting the file entirely, and provided a suggestion to revert the deletion and update the reference.

if: >-
github.event.check_run.conclusion == 'failure' &&
!startsWith(github.event.check_run.name, 'CI Failure Analyst')
uses: petry-projects/.github-private/.github/workflows/ci-failure-analyst-reusable.yml@0ef7b6150516c4fa447700b4902e8ed406bcfb99 # main

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

It appears that the entire templates/ci-failure-analyst.yml file is being deleted in this PR. Based on the PR title and description, the goal is to repin the workflow to the @ci-failure-analyst/stable channel rather than deleting the template. Please revert the deletion and update the uses reference instead.

    uses: petry-projects/.github-private/.github/workflows/ci-failure-analyst-reusable.yml@ci-failure-analyst/stable

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3568d1554e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
# Deploy this file to target repos as: .github/workflows/ci-failure-analyst.yml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore the CI Failure Analyst template stub

When this template is deployed by copying it to a target repo's .github/workflows/ci-failure-analyst.yml (as documented in docs/aw/ci-failure-analyst.md and referenced by the local lock workflow), the file is now empty, so newly onboarded repos get no check_run trigger, permissions, or uses: call into ci-failure-analyst-reusable.yml. That silently disables CI Failure Analyst instead of repinning the caller to @ci-failure-analyst/stable.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR advances the versioned-release/canary rollout for ci-failure-analyst by repinning the consumer workflow stub away from a raw main SHA to the moving ci-failure-analyst/stable channel tag, enabling gated, rollback-able releases across the fleet.

Changes:

  • Repin ci-failure-analyst reusable workflow reference from a main SHA to @ci-failure-analyst/stable.
  • Add an inline suppression comment to document that this is an approved first-party channel ref.

github.event.check_run.conclusion == 'failure' &&
!startsWith(github.event.check_run.name, 'CI Failure Analyst')
uses: petry-projects/.github-private/.github/workflows/ci-failure-analyst-reusable.yml@0ef7b6150516c4fa447700b4902e8ed406bcfb99 # main
uses: petry-projects/.github-private/.github/workflows/ci-failure-analyst-reusable.yml@ci-failure-analyst/stable # NOSONAR(githubactions:S7637) first-party channel ref
@don-petry
don-petry merged commit d1c57a4 into main Jul 11, 2026
22 of 29 checks passed
@don-petry
don-petry deleted the repin-ci-failure-analyst-stable-1159 branch July 11, 2026 02:50
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@don-petry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Dev-Lead — review-changes (applied)

Changes committed and pushed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants