You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Cross-repo impact-aware review annotations: proactive downstream-breakage detection in the pr-review pipeline #727
Extend the self-hosted pr-review pipeline so a reviewer sees, during review, when a PR changes a shared surface (a first-party reusable workflow, a scripts/lib/ shell library, or a prompts/ file) that downstream consumer repos depend on — flagging potential breakage before the change enters ring-0.
Why now. The ring-staged release strategy (docs/initiatives/agentic-release-strategy.md) mitigates blast radius after a change lands, but gives no proactive signal during review. The self-host deadlock (#619) and clean-PR stalls (#463) show ring-0 validation can itself fail when the broken agent gates its own fix; shift-left detection during review is complementary to the ring model, not redundant with it. CodeRabbit's multi-repo analysis (Mar 2026) validates this as an emerging expectation for platform repos serving multiple consumers. Scope is the pr-review workflow only (confirmed by don-petry on the discussion).
Architecture (grounded). The triage tier runs haiku 4.5 with no tools — it cannot fetch cross-repo data itself. So the detection follows the existing ADVISORY_BOT_FEEDBACK pattern in scripts/review-one-pr.sh: the shell computes impacted surfaces from a committed manifest, best-effort fetches consumer references via gh api, assembles a capped context block, and inlines it into the prompts. The whole pass is opt-in and degrades to a no-op (byte-for-byte unchanged behavior) when the manifest is absent or cross-repo reads fail — mirroring the REVIEW_MCP_CONFIG convention.
Shape: Phase 1 lays the data foundation (consumer manifest + validator). Phase 2 builds a pure changed-files->consumers mapping helper, then the cross-repo fetch + context assembly. Phase 3 wires the block into the triage/cascade prompts with advisory semantics and adds the end-to-end default-off regression guard + docs.
Not a duplicate of #610 (context-adaptive review artifact contract), #676 (MCP enrichment), or #690 (repinning consumers to channel tags) — this is a new, complementary downstream-impact signal. Source: discussion #653.
Planned from idea discussion #653 by the BMAD Scrum Master initiative-planner. Inert until a maintainer adds initiative:auto.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Jun 15, 2026
Superseded by #748 — re-planned from idea discussion #653. This epic and its stories were closed by the initiative-planner
force_replanpath.