You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 9, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 9, 2026. It is now read-only.
intrinsics K in FundamentalFromMotionAndCameras. #124
In this function, parameter pose means T_cam2_from_cam1.
Should the FundmentalMatrix be *F = camera2.GetK().transpose().inverse() * E * camera1.GetK().inverse();,
rather than *F = camera1.GetK().transpose().inverse() * E * camera2.GetK().inverse();?
Activity
zhan994 commentedon Oct 18, 2024
I've made a pull request here: #125 (comment)
lionlai1989 commentedon Oct 18, 2024
I think how
FundamentalFromMotionAndCamerasis used matters.The caller looks like:
FundamentalFromMotionAndCameras( camera1, camera2, image_pair.cam2_from_cam1, &image_pair.F); }Base on my understanding of essential and fundamental matrix, it looks like a bug indeed.