Fix preservation of scan id at scan init#1978
Merged
Merged
Conversation
I noticed this change here: blacklanternsecurity@02acd94#diff-c6756c35a5fb1d7b87dc0ed3d33a2d211374dc196f245d26a362c82c8c346d5cR131 I can only assume it was unintentional, given `id` is a python builtin function, and `str(id)` returns: ```py cmyui@Joshs-MacBook-Pro ~ % python3 Python 3.13.0 (main, Oct 7 2024, 05:02:14) [Clang 15.0.0 (clang-1500.3.9.4)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> str(id) '<built-in function id>' ```
Contributor
|
Nice catch! Thankfully this only would have triggered if a |
TheTechromancer
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2024
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was reading through the codebase & noticed this change happened here: 02acd94#diff-c6756c35a5fb1d7b87dc0ed3d33a2d211374dc196f245d26a362c82c8c346d5cR131
It looked like an unintentional regression, so I thought I'd open a pr to check
(
idis a python builtin function, andstr(id)returns):