checkSafeExclusion should always create new ExclusionSafetyCheckRequest#9868
Merged
Conversation
jzhou77
reviewed
Mar 31, 2023
Contributor
Result of foundationdb-pr-clang-ide on Linux CentOS 7
|
Collaborator
Doxense CI Report for Windows 10
|
jzhou77
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2023
Contributor
Result of foundationdb-pr-macos-m1 on macOS Ventura 13.x
|
Contributor
Result of foundationdb-pr-clang on Linux CentOS 7
|
Collaborator
|
I think the intention to use |
Contributor
Result of foundationdb-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Contributor
Author
That works too. All the other function using basicLoadBalance create the request while calling it. So maybe just be consistent with the rest of the code? |
Contributor
Result of foundationdb-pr-cluster-tests on Linux CentOS 7
|
This was referenced Apr 2, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We recently added a test to test
exclude failedcommand which exposed this bug in the existing code.When a client is issuing an ExclusionSafetyCheckRequest to check safe exclusion, if during this time, there is a proxy change, this will cancel the current basicLoadBalance() function along with the future created for the ExclusionSafetyCheckReply. However, when we re-issue the ExclusionSafetyCheckRequest again, we will use the same req object, whose reply future has already being cancelled. This causes the request to throw broken promise immediately, and then the host will mistakenly think the remote endpoint is failed.
This leads to the ExclusionSafetyCheckRequest to be blocked forever.
The fix is to re-create the ExclusionSafetyCheckRequest every time when issuing a new ExclusionSafetyCheckRequest.
Code-Reviewer Section
The general pull request guidelines can be found here.
Please check each of the following things and check all boxes before accepting a PR.
For Release-Branches
If this PR is made against a release-branch, please also check the following:
release-branchormainif this is the youngest branch)