[BugFix][TVMScript] Add doc.keyword handling for ExprEvaluator._visit#19352
Merged
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
tlopex
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2026
tlopex
left a comment
tlopex
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Thank you for the contribution!
Aharrypotter
pushed a commit
to Aharrypotter/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2026
…sit` (apache#19352) Add handling for `doc.keyword` nodes in `ExprEvaluator._visit` to ensure expressions (e.g. `BoolOp`) in keyword arguments are processed with correct evaluation methods. Fix apache#18972 . For more details, please refer to this issue.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add handling for
doc.keywordnodes inExprEvaluator._visitto ensure expressions (e.g.BoolOp) in keyword arguments are processed with correct evaluation methods.Fix #18972 . For more details, please refer to this issue.