Repository navigation
[SPARK-53730] Switch Spark 3.5 Java 11 docker registry images to 11-jammy - #95
peter-toth wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
cc @Yikun , @dongjoon-hyun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The root cause of this problem is that we extended Spark 3.5.x as LTS.
From my side, it's a little weird that Docker Hub requires us to change our repo. Both images are independent basically, aren't they? Given that (1) exists without (2), I prefer to change (1) only because it's a breaking change to change underlying OSes.
However, I know that you are making this PR as @Yikun 's recommendation. So, I wouldn't be against on this PR. Feel free to proceed this. I'm '0'.
I'm ok with this proposal as well. We could add |
|
@Yikun, @HyukjinKwon , I wonder if you have any idea how to publish 3.5.7 and future 3.5 releases to docker library? |
|
I think we can: For 3.5.7:
For future release: We can publish both two image from new code. |
|
Allright, thanks for the feedback @dongjoon-hyun and @Yikun. In that case is there anything I need to change in this PR? Once this PR is merged I can update https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/19948/files with the new commit hash. But we will not rerun |
|
Publish image action is triggered by manually. so I think this PR is OK to go, and do doi refresh after PR merged. And better to see is there any other comments from @dongjoon-hyun |
|
Thanks for the review @dongjoon-hyun , @Yikun ! Merged to |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to switch future Apache Spark 3.5 Java 11 docket images to
11-jammy.We have applied a similar change to Apache Spark repo Java 17 dockerfile in SPARK-49005 / apache/spark#47488.
Why are the changes needed?
The current
11-jre-focalis no longer supported by Docker Library: docker-library/official-images#19948 (comment)Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, we will not republish the 3.5.7 Apache Docker Hub image.
How was this patch tested?
Manual review.