-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Support remaining functions in protobuf serialization, add expr_fn for StructFunction
#8100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please remove this catch all clause so the compiler will ensure all enum variants are covered?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a problem! I will start chipping away at the last two enum variants here in a bit. Thanks for the feedback and openness allowing the contribution! 🙏
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alamb I was able to get the remaining cases covered with the exception to
datafusion::ScalarFunction::StructFun.Browsing the code I am not seeing a supported function for this enum variant in
expr_fn.rs. The scalar_expr macro maps to enum variants inbuilt_in_functions.rsbut has no match for StructFun. Should this be mapped to the Struct variant in the macro?Apologies for the confusion, but appreciate any guidance.
but only has
in the
BuiltinScalarFunction::$ENUMEDIT:
To follow up, if I add
scalar_expr!(Struct, struct_fun, val, "returns a vector of fields from the struct");toexpr_fn.rsthis passes the compiler checks and the tests. I just want to make sure this is the correct behavior before I commit.