Fix template-field validation in PapermillOperator - #70435
Merged
Conversation
bramhanandlingala
requested review from
amoghrajesh,
ashb,
bugraoz93,
gopidesupavan,
jason810496,
jscheffl and
potiuk
as code owners
July 25, 2026 13:02
1 task
Kunal8954
pushed a commit
to Kunal8954/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
…e-field validation in PapermillOperator (apache#70435)
7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes the
papermillprovider's entry from the #70296 exemption-list burn-down:PapermillOperator.input_nbandoutput_nbare template fields, but were validated in__init__— before Jinja templating runs, so the check ran against the raw un-rendered value.__init__toexecute(), after templating occurs.__init__now only does plain assignments.PapermillOperatorfrom the exemption list.Related to #70296
Gen-AI disclosure: I used a generative AI tool to help identify the root
cause, write tests, and draft the PR description. I reviewed, tested, and
verified all changes locally before submitting.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude following the guidelines